Sarah Palin Paul Revere History Lesson

Sarah Palins,s History Lesson on Paul Revere. That woman is an idiot! A short Funny Video

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• Sarah
• Palin
• Paul
• Revere
• History
• Lesson

[TheMostShockingVideo]

People are so stupid. They still buy the act

[TheDudleyheathens]

us english should of battled harder. we could of done better. we was the most powerful country in the world then and should of done better

[TheRudeAmerican]

I learned this in 2nd grade. Palin is an idiot!

[cinder544]

Christian pastor about to be executed in Iran because of his faith.

Where are the media?

Where is Obama?

Where is Congress?

Where is equal treatment?

[syzygy502]

@bambarus I've dealt with bluegsp and his moronic statements myself. He tries to make me lose brain cells. LOL.

[BlingsyB]

"Sarah wants a country! raaaaaah!"

[Trihowl]

@alphaomegastables I never said obama was any good, so im not really sure what your point is....

[Viatriste]

@uranorexic Better get your blood pressure checked and an EEG. You are really having a breakdown aren't you.

[Viatriste]

You're too emotionally disturbed to be here. How long have you been without your medications for? You're paranoid, manifested by violent impulsuve thought patterns, and compulsions, and probably pose a danger to the communty. I feel sorry for you.

[kidkong584]

Most of it is really just folklore. He never went through the streets yelling THE BRITTISH ARE COMING or hung the lanterns or anything like that. All he did was talk to John Adams about it.

[Viatriste]

@uranorexic Where on earth did you learn basic English? Your attempts at sentences reflect that your thoughts are scattered ,and very disorganized, and indicate disturbed emotionality. You're quite sad.

[bambarus]

Bluegsp is an idiot. So is sarah palin. The end.

[tgear77]

@tgear77 (cont) When that tactic didn't work, you then came at me with insults, again thinking that it would somehow justify Palin's lack of knowledge. Your arguments on this thread have been pathetic attempts to defend your dream girl and they have not worked. What makes me, and any rational person reading this thread, laugh out loud is your delusional idea that you have actually won this debate. Sorry, pal, but you were never in this debate. Go back to the kiddie table.

[tgear77]

@bluegsp By the way,there is very little to explain about Obama and Auschwitz. He got the camp wrong. His great-uncle helped liberate Buchenwald. The White House admitted that Obama made an error. So there you go. When Palin admits that she ever made a mistake in her life, hell will freeze over.

[tgear77]

@bluegsp I am not parsing anything about Palin's statement. I am using her own words to show that she is wrong, which she most definitely is. And how is either of the examples you gave about Obama 'far more egregious' than Palin's flubbing of not just basic American history but something she had explained to her less than an hour before? The only one of us here with a warped agenda is you, who keeps trying to defend the indefensible. She was wrong. Live with it.

[tgear77]

@bluegsp So because you are ignorant of basic American history, we should give Palin a pass as well?She did screw up the facts. She is a moron. And I knew all about Revere and what happened in Lexington and Concord that night. Forgive me for not being as ignorant as you are.

[tgear77]

@bluegsp By my logic, Obama is a typical politician. He'll say anything to pander to the audience before him. Read the whole speech. He never said his parents were at the March in Selma nor did he that he was conceived because of the March in Selma. He danced around the edges and said what would make the voters in Selma happy. Ethical? This is a politician we're talking about here. Lying? No. An Idiot? For playing the game better than Palin? No way.

[tgear77]

@tgear77 (cont) a US citizen knowing about Paul Revere and knowing about Emperor Hirohito, which you prove by not spelling his name correctly. As for the March on Selma, he never comes out and says that his parents met at the March, but insinuates that because of events like it, his existence was possible. Read the text of his speech and see a politician making a typical vote-grab by claiming he can relate to a certain group. Like Palin lying about the teleprompter to a group of Ohio voters.

[tgear77]

@bluegsp No, but she says that he was out there ringing bells and firing guns while riding his horse (which is wrong) and he was warning the British that they weren't going to take our guns (which is also wrong). Revere's mission was a covert one, so he was not drawing attention to himself by firing guns and ringing bells. Nor, when you stretch things to say he warned the British, did he say anything about their taking our guns. This is from Revere's own letter. So Palin was wrong, as are you.

[tgear77]

@bluegsp We all agree that Palin was in the ballpark, as any American with at least a grade school education should be. Of course, for someone who had just completed a tour centered on Revere and his ride, to have screwed up the facts so soon afterward speaks volumes of her mental ability. And like most Palin-ites, you try to justify her mistakes by pointing out those of others. Yes, Obama was wrong about Hirohito signing the declaration of surrender. But there is a huge difference between...

[tgear77]

@bluegsp Again, all true. He was caught by a Regulars unit. He did bluff his way free from them by stating that they would be facing 500 guns if they kept going. All true. And none of this is what Palin stated in her babbling nonsensical answer. What makes it even worse is that a) she did not have to mention any of this at all to answer the question asked, and b) she had just taken the tour and could not even recall the facts. What a short-term memory she has.LOL!

[tgear77]

@tgear77 (cont) British that they were not going to take our guns. With a gun to his head, he told the members of a 10- 12 main Regulars unit that if they kept going, they would run into 500 armed militia men. What Peszka said is correct: people did ring bells. What Palin said is incorrect: Revere did not ring bells. The facts show that Palin was wrong. You can try and spin it all you want, but she was wrong, as are you.

[tgear77]

@bluegsp So, yesterday Ayres was good enough for you to claim that he vindicated Palin. Today hi is a frustrated 'left wing liberal'. Palin was not right. Revere's mission that night was to warn Hancock and Adams of their impending arrest under orders of British General Gage. Revere even admits this in his own writings. Although he did warn members of the militia's Alarm & Muster tree to spread the word, he himself was not firing shots and ringing bells as he rode. And he did not warn the...

[tgear77]

@tgear77 (cont) comments, where he says that Palin's little mind couldn't handle all that he told her and that she couldn't keep things straight and then twist that into saying that "Ayres said she was right". Talk about being delusional and in denial; You sure are. Palin was wrong and not even Revere's letter to Bellknapp says she was right. You are the one who needs to go and read it. LOL that you think Ayres was agreeing with Palin. You are truly hopeless.

[tgear77]

@bluegsp Ayres did not say that she got it right. He said that her mistakes could possibly have come about from things he said to her as they toured the Church right before Palin asked the infamous question. He also stated that although he might be the one who gave her some of the information, he would not take the blame for her not getting the facts in order. He also said that it was possibly "too much too quickly" for her to handle. I love that you and other Palin defenders could read his...