Mustang 4.6 Vs Mustang 5.0

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,906
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 29, 2010

My buddy sold his m3 (from other vids check em out) and bought a 2000 mustang gt with 74k miles, Flowmaster catback, K&N cold air intake for 6200, What do you guys think?

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (xtreme3484)

  • Love how the 225hp 5.0 keeps up with the 260hp 4.6 , the 5.0 superior lowend grunt always take the start but the 4.6 has more topend power , i dont hate the 2v 4.6s but if u ask me the 5.0 is just a better all around engine, simpler to work on, smaller size and dat torque, now a 4v 4.6 is a different monster.

  • @cubano1389 Weight is a big factor here, stock for stock the pi motor is better But depends how much you wanna spend i cant wait to get my 4v going Thats the best bet really.

  • @xtreme3484 True, a fox is lighter, but not by much when they are stock, specially hatchbacks, the hatchs is one heavy piece. But i pulled on my friends 99 with my 94 5.0 without any problem at all, we both have basically the same mods, hes is automatic and maybe thats why i pulled on him so bad.

  • @cubano1389 Uh well my fox weighed a good 200 pounds less then that pretty much full option 00 gt. So id whats alot to you but thats alot man

  • I want to get either a 95 cobra or a 96-98 cobra. The 95's are special because they have that 5.0 in it, and that would be cool to have. But the 96+ Cobras have that 4v DOHC 4.6, which is more technologically advanced and has more HP. I don't know which one to get, can yall help me out?

  • @punchmaster123 get the dohc thats what engin i swapped in my 98. Well worth the money good power at decent cost. The 94-95 cobras are nice too but a little under rated. stay away from gts.

see all

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @TeamNCR2012 ...i have driven an 97 gt with 3.73's and catback with c.a.i.....i have a 93 5.0 with full exhaust c.a.i. and stock 3.08's....it pulls harder than the 97...just saying, i have also race a 04 gt with a catback and i pulled away....just saying....your talking a little bullshit

  • nice race but the 5.0 suck my 98 gt all stock just have 373 gear and i kill them all the time. even the ones that have shit in them.lol but hell i dont even no what even in this car cuz i did not know it had 373 gears till now.lol race any 5.0 out in fresno whats up.

  • @punchmaster123 Well the 5.0s in 94-95 cobras are basically the same as a normal 5.0 but they came with gt40 cobra intake and gt40 heads along with 1.7 roller rockers and basically the same cam as a 5.0 GT, u can pretty much make a normal 5.0 a cobra 5.0 with just getting the gt40 heads off an explorer and an aftermarket cam with a better intake and u got a good little motor, ppl make around 260 to 295 rwhp with only those mods, and swaping heads in 5.0 is easy.

  • @RaudiAudiT Damn you should be in a record book if you can speed up time...

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more