GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt Travels To Japan To Address Nuclear Crisis

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,048
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (52)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "Obama in appointing Immelt last January praised him as a business leader who "understands what it takes for America to compete in the global economy." Apparently, what Immelt understands is that what it takes to satisfy corporate interests instead of national needs is conning a president into looking the other way while you send jobs abroad." --Robert Scheer, Huffington Post

  • I Believe This Was A Video Clip Of ABC News' ABC World News With David Muir's Weekend Edition's Report On GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt Travels To Japan To Address Nuclear Crisis On Saturday Evening, April 2, 2011.

  • Holy shit, what's with that scaremongering. It's not highly radioactive water, it is MILDLY radioactive water. -_-

    Easily confused only be the American MSM.

  • whatever its all bad

  • @KBekman All I said was 12thousand tons =approx 24 million gallons. I didn't argue with the 187 quintillion gallons in the ocean.

  • @IExposeMormonism Sorry, wrong source, its 35,000,000,000,000,000 gallons of water in the Pacific Ocean. the ocean is REALLY big and gallons are not. 30 or 3 million, it wont make a difference, it'll dilute, the fish will be safe, I promise.

  • @KBekman 12 thousand tons it's approx 24 million gallons. Not to mix apples and pears, The Only place I come across the word Quintillion is in "Derivatives" And Astrophysics."We"the people now owe certain peoples some $Quintillions thru derivative losses thru the likes of Bears Stern, AIG, etc. When I put that $quintillions and 24million gallons of funny fizzy drinks and stir it, it has a funny smell. When I put187 quintillion gallons with the 5 or so $Quintillion of derivitives::someone owns US

  • @IExposeMormonism If they need to bury Fukushima, whats the big deal? It will be an accident that was contained. And 600,000 plutonium pellets will await no one, they await concrete or water, whichever is deemed appropriate. Also, they're dumping 3 million gallons, not 125 million, and they're dumping it into an ocean with 187 quintillion gallons of water, so its gunna get real dilute real fast. So sorry, the fish only get two eyes, which is kinda a shame, they look funnier with 3.

  • @KBekman Lets see, you said "Impressive demonstration of ...engineers to design (a) remarkably safe Nuke...". Then You mention "Buildings" and "Trauma". You did. And this entire Fukushima complex of necessity will be buried under concrete. All of it. And those 600,000 little erasure head plutonium pellets (and counting) await you. And the 2 nukes up the street are going off now, too. and the 125,000,000 (million) gallons of water and counting is good for three eyed fish, so have at it.

  • @IExposeMormonism And Chernobyl was SOOOOO much worse than this, dont take my word for it, do some research. And don't say dumb things like "way past 4 chernobyls and it didn't break immediately, like those 3 puny World Trade Center buildings on 911;" that's like saying a half a pear is way past 4 pears and 3 unicorns. First, you're wrong, and what does September 11th have to do with any of this?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more