vr6 turbo vs mk2 1.8T 20vt
Loading...
54,392
Uploader Comments (vr6power111)
Top Comments
-
Pronunciation:\ə-ˈbau̇t\
Function:adverb
Etymology:Middle English, from Old English abūtan, from 1a- + būtan outside — more at but
Date:before 12th century
1 a: reasonably close to
...so i dont know why you disagreed with me.
see all
All Comments (21)
-
disghusting
-
mk3>mk2??? O.o
-
vr6 the best
-
spanked
-
i know. dudes a douche isnt he. its like he's trying to start a fight or something over the internet. i was just trying to correct someones ridiculous statement and he gets all specific like he did the math or something but then says "about" i dont get it. oh well. some people are just like that.
-
My bad, your right. It looks like he (Vr6) had almost 2 car lengths at the end.
Loading...
for a start the vr6 has a near on 50 percent displacement advantage and having been converted to a turbo setup of course it won against a standard probable 180bhp 1.8t now spend the money that has been spent on that vr6 turbo engine and race again the vr6 would be beaten very easily considering a 400 pound chip and a ko3s turbo(£340) see's u at about 260-270bhp
mr2goodforyou 2 years ago
that mk2 got 260-270 bhp in that video'
1.8t with k04, ecu upgrade and more...
and the turbo kit fot the vr6 didn't cost more than the mk2 engine swap
but mk2 it's a good platform to build a fast ass car
vr6power111 2 years ago 2
Vr6 2.9????
smjakkkk 2 years ago
2.8 12v with GMC savana turbo and stock engine :)
vr6power111 2 years ago
close race, 2.8 12 valve versus 1.8 20 valve turbo. I thought the turbo would have beat him but not by much..
MorePOwerplz 4 years ago
for this you called "not by much"? he beat him by very very much! look at the end,and the camera is from behind so do the math.
vr6power111 4 years ago