A Protocell Forming from Fatty Acids

you should see my evolution vid and the links within
later

I really don't like getting into Youtube debates. They're pointless. I know I'm not going to change your opinions or beliefs. Honestly, you're probably not going to change my views either, especially if anything else you're going to say resembles what you've said already. Nothing you've told me so far has made any real impression.

agreed. sometimes i feel obliged to confront or ask about things. i guess if u have faith in abiogenesis or all of darwinism, as i did through college (but i was open minded enough to change) the unproven/illogical aspects will be ignored by u just as christians do the same. its cool, if i didnt accidently read 1 convo and only had the bias 1 sided lectures from school id be like u. believing in something wont make it true anyhow. if u want a more advanced model of evolution see my vid/the links

I watched your video. You seem to be making a huge error in that you confuse supernatural religious things with scientific things.
Don't bring a soul to a scientific debate, because there's no evidence that it exists.

That's the problem with debates in general!
My quibble with youtube debates is the fact that whenever I scroll through a debate I've had, I feel like kicking whichever bonehead designed the comments system!

It just got so many thumb downs...I don't remember what it said, but it obviously didn't make sense.
Yeah, evolution and abiogenesis are separate theories. Honestly though, very little is actually proven in science. Abiogenesis is science regardless of whether it's proven or not. It's still a proposed explanation of the origin of life.

how is it science if its never proven and all efforts become more futile?? how is it any more science than intelligant design?

I already told you, science isn't about proving things for certain. A lot of things can be proven beyond any reasonable doubt, but not everything. If thinking about something that can't be proven is futile to you, then why would you say anything about religion, evolution, or the origin of life at all?
Science is about data, observation, and conclusion. The difference between that and ID is that ID concludes, then creates and manipulates data and observation.

u already admitted there has never been any observation of abiogenesis occuring and the data shows 100% failure, so the conclusion is it's a poorly made faith based idea. id rather look into the vedic model, from the most reliable/valid source that can somewhat be observed from the data and make the best possible conclusion based on logic and the evidence at hand. but if your faith is otherwise never mind just letting u know

You've got it wrong there. The observation is that there are species and species have evolved. We see through the fossil record that organisms have come to resemble modern species over time. The only explanation that doesn't involve envoking the supernatural is abiogenesis. Abiogenesis is simply how life first occurred. There are many proposed models for it, and I don't believe in any specific one.