There are an infinite number of possible phenomenon given infinite permutations of an infinite number of physical constants/rules. I am not saying there are an infinite number of universes and we just happen to occupy the one that allows for life. My argument is that life is not objectively significant other than the fact that it seems to be rare in this universe and most other possible universes make life impossible. The only argument I've ever seen put forth by apologists to establish the significance of the phenomenon of life is their mere assertion that it's significant which I find to be biocentric/biased. An infinite number of possible phenomenon are made impossible in our universe because of its physical constants, and in if this universe did have those physical constants the phenomenon might be ever rarer than the phenomenon of life. I ask you apologists, what makes life significant? Your answer can't be that it's rare because as I've just said, there are rarer phenomenon than the phenomenon of life.
I love hard nipples -3
SlightlyInsane94 1 month ago