Fine Tune My Nipples, Bitch

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
233 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 19, 2009

There are an infinite number of possible phenomenon given infinite permutations of an infinite number of physical constants/rules. I am not saying there are an infinite number of universes and we just happen to occupy the one that allows for life. My argument is that life is not objectively significant other than the fact that it seems to be rare in this universe and most other possible universes make life impossible. The only argument I've ever seen put forth by apologists to establish the significance of the phenomenon of life is their mere assertion that it's significant which I find to be biocentric/biased. An infinite number of possible phenomenon are made impossible in our universe because of its physical constants, and in if this universe did have those physical constants the phenomenon might be ever rarer than the phenomenon of life. I ask you apologists, what makes life significant? Your answer can't be that it's rare because as I've just said, there are rarer phenomenon than the phenomenon of life.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Video Responses

This video is a response to RE: A question about design arguments
see all

All Comments (1)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I love hard nipples -3

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more