BURDEN OF PROOF!!

Paying a bit of homage to NonStampCollector with this one:

http://www.youtube.com/user/NonStampCollector

Aside from that, it's pretty self-explanatory.

It took me a dozen attempts to get this thing to upload right due to my bad connection. That's part of the reason I haven't been making many videos lately.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• burden
• of
• proof
• atheist
• theist
• prove
• your
• god
• exists
• not
• the
• other
• way
• around
• and
• nonstampcollector
• kicks
• ass
• subscribe
• to
• him

[undergroundjackal]

a strong atheist is as no good as a christian that is why you look like a retard.

[stefzula]

@undergroundjackal Your assumption that I'm a "strong atheist" makes you look far worse than any Christian OR  retard.

[CenaxKikia]

@undergroundjackal Theism, on the other hand, is a positive claim. It starts as false, and must be proven true. The burden of proof for a theistic claim is asking for it to be proven true.. So far, that has never happened before either. These aren't opinions, they are the definitions of TRUE and FALSE in English. Positive and Negative are reference points of a claim. The biggest error of a creationist asking for Truth in Atheism is considering Atheism a positive polarity.

[dacrocker]

Amen! LOL

[PerfectWoman2]

@HeavyTrafficAhead

So how do you explain the false rape society? And you base your judgement on... Law and order???

Omg that's unbelievable. Don't tell me you also take seriously CSI or Mr Bean... lol

cose the real world has nothing to do with some ridiculous tv program. In the real world more than 1000 innocent men go to prison in the usa every year. Go watch false rape society. or youtube /user/FalseAccusers have fun

[HeavyTrafficAhead]

@PerfectWoman2 YES I am 100% sure. When you are charged with a crime you are presumed innocent and the state must reach a threshold of the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt before a jury can even decide the matter of cuilt or innocence. Geez, haven't you ever watched Law And Order? Never mind 'dim bulb' that sucker is burned out and dark.

[PerfectWoman2]

@HeavyTrafficAhead

Are you sure dim bulb X100? because I know that it is in Usa up to the man accused to prove his innocence, and if he cannot prove he didn't do that (which is the point I was trying to make here, good for you you didn't notice that) then he goes to prison. How do you explain Biurny Gonzalez?

Watch /watch?v=8eEWrGjOTaQ dim bulb X10,000

[HeavyTrafficAhead]

@PerfectWoman2 It's the other way around, dim bulb. The state(ie the prosecutors) are the ones making the affirmative claim that the man is guilty of the charges and THEY are the ones that have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was responsible for the crime to convict him. Works that way this question too. The existent of God is the claim and the 'defense' would be the assertion that there is not, hence the burden of proof of 'guilt' (that there is a God) rest on those claimants.

[PerfectWoman2]

...of something does not mean that that thing actually exists. I can't prove that there isn't a banana on planet Pluto, I can only say that it is very improbable, however that is no scientific proof. The fact that I can't scientificly prove the existence of a banana on Pluto (human beings have never landed on pluto, so no real evidence about that) doesn't mean that there actually IS a banana on Pluto. So how can atheist feminist apply double standards? I am an atheist btw, but I was just thinkn

[PerfectWoman2]

How does that apply to rape?

If a woman says she has been raped by a man, and that man says he didn't rape that woman, she is making an affermative claim, he is denying it, so he is making a negative claim. The judge in USA will ask that man to prove he didn't do it, which is like asking atheists to prove that God does not exist. If that man won't be able to prove that he didn't rape her, he is going to prison (even if he didn't do it, since not being able to prove the inexistence of...

[undergroundjackal]

@ezmereldagreen poppycock? LOL!! to you simply because you do not understand. try studying a lil bit of quantum physics and tell me that. you either believe in something or you dont is ignoramus "when you think about it" strong atheism is about as narrow minded as a "strong" christian but dumber when you think about. so come up with a better argument.