Turn down the lights
Turn up the lights
Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Aim High: Using Thorium Energy to Address Environmental Prob

Google Tech Talk May 26, 2009 Presented by Robert Hargraves. Mankind's fossil fuel burning releases CO2 into the atmosphere, contributing to global warming and deadly air pollution. Natural res...  
 
Customize

More From: googletechtalks

Energy From Thorium: A Nuclear Waste Burning Liquid Salt Thorium Reactor1:22:09
11,487 views
Liquid Fluoride Reactors:  A New Beginning for an Old Idea1:07:16
8,438 views
Microlaunchers: The case for a New Generation of Very Small1:11:38
1,900 views
FullView Panoramic Cameras40:30
2,625 views
Design of the Zero X and Zero S Electric Motorcycles1:01:26
3,691 views
Deeya Flow Battery42:18
1,738 views
The Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor:  What Fusion Wanted To Be55:17
40,356 views
An Economic Architecture for Cloud Computing1:00:37
5,513 views
Designing a Space Settlement48:37
4,089 views
How a Kiwi Built an Interactive Vision Guided Robot37:04
4,065 views
Supersymmetry, Extra Dimensions and the Origin of Mass1:12:35
8,760 views
Innovation Survival: Innovation in Medicine52:24
1,923 views
Using Engineering Principles To Study and Manipulate Biologi49:25
2,845 views
Life's Too Short - Write Fast Code (part 2)55:52
36,420 views
The Secret History of Silicon Valley56:31
141,042 views
Changes to JavaScript, Part 1: EcmaScript 559:28
10,808 views
Learn about Solar Energy and Solar Panel Installation...57:44
71,136 views
Practicing Wisdom in the Obama Era57:06
1,578 views
Speed Up Your JavaScript56:23
18,452 views
Rebuilding Cambodia: Cultivating a New Generation of Women Leaders50:44
11,039 views

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
62 ratings
Sign in to rate
5,759 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (23)   Options

Loading...
heavyweather (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
It's too expensive anyways. A 1GW kitegen would cost 80-100 million. No fuel needed and no decomissioning costs.
Only maintainance work which would create a local industry.
aishumadz (3 months ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
u'r right about the fertiliser part but increasing co2 is also causing problems...................... .......even plants breathe out co2..........everyone needs to breathe to live......understand?
d0nj03 (3 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
Are you for real? Plants take IN the CO2 and put OUT the OXYGEN (O2) that WE breathe in.

Man, the Church of AGW is full of scientific illiterates, isn't it.
aishumadz (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
what do you mean? (no offense)
yushis1 (4 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
No offense taken, I meant pretty much what I said though.

In 1963 - 1969, the NASA budget was about 3 - 5% of the US Federal budget. This has slowly been whittled down to 0.52% for 2010.

And it shows - back then NASA built a rocket platform from scratch and put men on the moon. Nowadays it accomplishes very little in comparison.

It just seems like whenever someone needs money for a pet project, they propose taking the funds from NASA because they know that not very many people will object.
myrmecophilous (3 months ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
I agree, it's BS. Everyone picks on NASA because they don't realize how much technological innovation NASA generates; everyday technology everyone takes for granted wouldn't exist but for NASA.

How about taking some money from the defense budget instead? (over 514 billion$, nearly as much as the rest of the world combined). Do they really need laser planes? I don't think so.
bernzeppi (5 months ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Remember back in the day (60's) when James Lovelock popularized gaia theory... all followers of the global warming ideology were anti-establishment, pot smoking, left wing, free sex, sitar playing idiot commies intent on bringing down the west's financial system?

.. well now if you believe in it you are a right wing lying establishment butt-hole intent on getting rich out of this fake trumped up unbelievable fantasy green pseudoscience which will end up bringing down the global economy.

sigh!
bernzeppi (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
you can prove its not a deadly pollutant by putting a plastic bag over your head... when the co2 builds up you get horny and have a big wank... co2 is obviously good dude!
Ask David carridine or michael hutchence
d0nj03 (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
That's no more relevant than saying water is a "deadly pollutant" because you die if you seal your head inside a bowl full of it. The fact that a particular substance was never meant to be breathed by humans is not enough to make it a "deadly pollutant".

Wise ass.
bernzeppi (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
thankyou

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.