Mitt Romney Wins New Hampshire —But Who Is Mitt Romney?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
691 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 11, 2012

MANCHESTER, N.H.--Mitt Romney's more than 15-point victory over Ron Paul in the New Hampshire primary provided a big boost for his candidacy as the race for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination heads to South Carolina. Romney is the first non-incumbent Republican presidential candidate to win both Iowa and New Hampshire since Iowa assumed the pole position in the party's race to the nomination in 1976.
Romney is now in a stronger position to capture the nomination than he has ever been in, despite a tough 48 hours spent defending his work as a venture capitalist.
Yet Romney is still some distance from being able to put the race away. South Carolina, where Republicans vote on Jan. 21, will be a pivotal and defining contest. Every Republican candidate since 1980 who became the party's presidential nominee has won the South Carolina primary.
"Tonight, we made history," Romney said to cheering supporters at his victory celebration. "Tonight, we celebrate. Tomorrow, we go back to work."
And work it will be. A barrage of negative television advertising against Romney, unlike anything he has faced thus far in the campaign, awaits him in South Carolina. The pro-Gingrich super PAC "Winning Our Future" plans to begin airing an ad Wednesday based on an anti-Romney documentary about his tenure at Bain Capital. The group plans to spend more than $3 million to make sure it is seen far and wide.
"President Obama wants to put free enterprise on trial," Romney said Tuesday. "In the last few days, we have seen some desperate Republicans join forces with him. This is such a mistake for our Party and for our nation. This country already has a leader who divides us with the bitter politics of envy. We must offer an alternative vision."
Romney's victory was broad. He was competitive among independents, very conservative, and evangelical voters. He also bested the competition among strong supporters of the Tea Party.
Romney's greatest challenge going forward is that the Republican primary electorate in New Hampshire is not like the electorate he will find in South Carolina and beyond. Nearly 60 percent of Republican voters in New Hampshire on Tuesday said they were moderate to liberal on social issues. That will not be the case in South Carolina.
Two key assets that helped Romney separate himself from the pack were his presumed electability and the comfort among Republican voters with the notion of Romney as their standard bearer.
A majority of voters tonight said Romney was the candidate most able to beat Barack Obama and 60 percent of them said they would be comfortable if Romney emerged as the party's nominee.
Ron Paul rode to a strong second place showing by again relying on independents and first time voters. He won 37 percent of first-time voters, according to exit polls conducted by the National Election Pool on behalf of the Associated Press and the five television networks. Unfortunately for Paul, first-time voters made up a much smaller slice of the electorate in New Hampshire (13 percent) than they did in Iowa last week (38 percent). In order to fight back to within striking distance of Romney in South Carolina and beyond, Paul will need to bring many more new voters into the process.
Jon Huntsman gambled everything on New Hampshire and came in a distant third, but he vowed to continue his campaign.
"Where we stand right now is a solid, comfortable, confident position. And we go south from here," Huntsman, a former Utah governor, told CNN in an interview as he prepared to move forward with his campaign to South Carolina's first-in-the-South primary.
Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum rounded out the top five with a disappointing 10 percent of the vote each. Santorum was unable to convert his burst of energy out of the Iowa caucuses into a significant showing here.
In 2008, more than 234,000 votes were cast in New Hampshire's Republican primary. Despite the absence of a competitive race on the Democratic side this year, turnout looked headed for a similar showing, which could raise questions about overall Republican enthusiasm.
One big question hanging over the race for the next 10 days is whether or not the Huntsman super PAC gets a huge infusion of cash from Huntsman's father to begin airing TV ads against Mitt Romney. It also remains to be seen if Rick Perry, who has had South Carolina mostly to himself for the last several days, can reignite significant support and if he has the money to do so.
Romney will also have to work to turn around the negative narrative his opponents and the White House have built, framing him as a Wall Street "corporate raider," which may not be easily shaken as the race heads to the most economically challenged state of the contest thus far.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @CristianoRomae1986 I'm not at all making your point. You missed my first sentence. You can't legislate morality. I find all of those things (with the exception of gay marriage) to be immoral and disgusting. However, the use of government to force my morality upon two or more consenting adults 1. will never work, and 2. is, in itself, immoral. It's not the role of government to decide how people live their lives, as long as those people aren't violating other's rights.

  • @intoxicated12gauge

    Has nothing to do with Christian. Or Muslim or Jew.

    It has to do with the fact that A CONSENTING ADULT can consent to marriage to INCEST and POLYGAMY by opening this HOMOSEXUAL "MARRIAGE".

    Right? You want to open the doors, fine! I'll see you at the voting ballot, better yet the SUPREME COURT.

  • @CristianoRomae1986 It's not okay to legislate morality in that manner. If we do, then we punish people and use violence against people despite the fact that they are acting in a way that is peaceful and non-violent. I don't like polygamy. I think it's immoral. But I don't have the right to force that view on other people using government. That wouldn't be very christian would it?

  • If Ron Paul gets nominated by the GOP, he will get the votes of the Libertarian Party, Constitution Party, Independent voters, and some democrats backing him. If Romney gets nominated, he will not get the 3rd party votes nor the independent and democrat vote resulting in a second term for Obama. Think about it...

  • You make the exact point as well.

    SO if you do allow homosexual marriage----you must also give way to those who request a legal standing on their and incestous polygamous relationships. Right?

    I just want to point out that when you open the door for one, you open the door for all. It sets a precedence. (Fine, I won't include bestiality on this one since a cat or dog cannot make their own statements to marry.)

    But incestuous, polygamous, and homosexual partners can consent to marriage.

  • Mitt Romney's father & grandfather lived in a settlement in Mexico that practiced polygamy --- it's not ancient history

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more