i laughed when i heard Obama say what he did about Buffet, so blatantly misleading and untrue. all that speech was, was just more of the same, raise taxes so we can spend our way to prosperity. worked great so far right? the guy is clueless
SERIOUSLY?? That's the Second Time i have heard Carney say that the President said to put Party Ahead of Country, and O'Reilly, love ya man but why are you not going after Carney for that??
1. Increasing revenue isn't bad, increasing tax rates is. There's a difference btwn the 2, btw.
2. Yes, at some point we can't cut anymore. We're far from that now tho.
3. There are no studies that show spending more on education produces better education for the student. There are studies showing the opposite, however. Besides, funding education is not Fed Gov't role.
@jaredmaass We can create revenue and cut at the same time. Lower corporate tax to 25% with a 5% tax credit if you create jobs for the long term unemployed based on the size of one's company. Oil companies need to stop receiving subsidies to find oil when they'ere sitting on billions in profit, and corporations don't need to have so many loopholes to exploit. Ending the war on drugs and legalizing prostitution creates millions of jobs, and gives the government $15 billion. You got a better idea?
@jaredmaass I made the account when i was 12 and can't figure out how to change it. If you read, what I said was the smartest people aren't teaching anymore because the money simply isn't there. I'm not saying pay them like a ceo but $30,000 is a little low for the people that are responsible for educating me in a world that's progressing faster than the U.S. My point is republicans don't want to create any revenue and just want to cut everything (ie. education funding).
Eh? He wants to lower so many taxes on small businesses and the self employed and to raise taxes on the RICHEST people in America. How is that not fair? Did he not say in the speech its tax cuts for small business, or for the big oil companies, not both. Tax cuts for middle income earners or for the top 10% of the country, not both. That makes SENSE, and he wants to fall on the side of most people, not the top 5-10%
orielly is brilliant
leonarddaccardi 5 months ago
@LibertyDownUnder ...watch an episode of his show and you will be sucked in ....with just one episode
TheJasonDR 5 months ago
I'm not a fan of O'Reilly, but he's correct with his criticism of this whole Warren Buffet tax nonsense.
Obama stands for nothing apart from some empty slogans and a big Government agenda.
LibertyDownUnder 5 months ago
SERIOUSLY?? That's the Second Time i have heard Carney say that the President said to put Party Ahead of Country, and O'Reilly, love ya man but why are you not going after Carney for that??
FreedomTrooper89 5 months ago
@hollaatyaboy12
1. Increasing revenue isn't bad, increasing tax rates is. There's a difference btwn the 2, btw.
2. Yes, at some point we can't cut anymore. We're far from that now tho.
3. There are no studies that show spending more on education produces better education for the student. There are studies showing the opposite, however. Besides, funding education is not Fed Gov't role.
4. Suggest you transfer classes or schools.
5. R's want wealth gap? Cite source, please.
InvestigatorDave 5 months ago
@jaredmaass We can create revenue and cut at the same time. Lower corporate tax to 25% with a 5% tax credit if you create jobs for the long term unemployed based on the size of one's company. Oil companies need to stop receiving subsidies to find oil when they'ere sitting on billions in profit, and corporations don't need to have so many loopholes to exploit. Ending the war on drugs and legalizing prostitution creates millions of jobs, and gives the government $15 billion. You got a better idea?
hollaatyaboy12 5 months ago
@jaredmaass I made the account when i was 12 and can't figure out how to change it. If you read, what I said was the smartest people aren't teaching anymore because the money simply isn't there. I'm not saying pay them like a ceo but $30,000 is a little low for the people that are responsible for educating me in a world that's progressing faster than the U.S. My point is republicans don't want to create any revenue and just want to cut everything (ie. education funding).
hollaatyaboy12 5 months ago
Eh? He wants to lower so many taxes on small businesses and the self employed and to raise taxes on the RICHEST people in America. How is that not fair? Did he not say in the speech its tax cuts for small business, or for the big oil companies, not both. Tax cuts for middle income earners or for the top 10% of the country, not both. That makes SENSE, and he wants to fall on the side of most people, not the top 5-10%
MBAYMZTU 5 months ago
@TKDMike58
No. Liberalism is a cancer on America. And please have the intellectual acuity to quit referring to the Tea Party as a monolith...
scribe7580 5 months ago 2
TEA PARTY IS CANCER on America
TKDMike58 5 months ago