9/11 Strange New Footage WTC7

~rare pictures + strange (unseen...?) report reveals major fires and destruction around the wtc complex

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911
• 2001
• new footage
• wtc7
• world trade center 7
• unpublished
• unseen
• rare
• burned
• TV
• report
• slideshow
• new 911 video
• video
• film
• movie
• undisclosed
• clip
• building what?
• building seven
• 2010
• 9/11
• AM
• SORRY
• The
• Falling
• Part
• nyfd
• cars
• fire
• busses
• previously

[volkovmodel1]

That's what americans are willing to do for money and power, killing their own people! what a shame, crazy ass people fuccccckkkk themmmmmmm

[volkovmodel1]

00:06 Resident Evil real life lol

[bloggulator]

The videographer gets very close to the dumpsters, and the smoke coming out is thick, black and oily.. with brown, even dark orange colored smoke mixed in. On the soundtrack, he is coughing and talked about the terrible acrid stench, like burning rubber, and says "I gotta get outta here because I can't breathe".

[bloggulator]

The billowing clouds of thick black smoke seen coming from the base of WTC were caused by dumpsters filled with VEHICLE TIRES, positioned at the base of one side of the building. How and why those were there, I have no idea.. but that is the cause of most of the thick smoke. The video of this occasionally gets posted here on youtube but invariably gets quickly pulled for "breach of copyright" reasons. I will post it if I can find it.

[BlakGlasses]

@NinjaAntx lol I posted from my phone, it said "reply" and I did. I don't care if it was "personal" or "public", point is what I am saying are facts. It wouldn't matter how many times I showed proof, you would shoot it down with some shit you learned from Alex Jones.

[NinjaAntx]

@BlakGlasses That was real sweet of you to send me a personal message but I don't swing that way. If you are 100% you know what happened then congratulations but if you have no proof then I suggest you find some before you start posting irrelevant shit.

[BlakGlasses]

Someone pointed out BBC called the collapse of WTC7 early, which is fact, they did indeed. The fact is this, FDNY knew it was going to collapse because they could see/hear the structure weakening. The windows were popping, due to hot fires and the building sagging. The building was creaking as well. The warning was, "will collapse" and 5 hrs later it did. It would be easy for BBC to call it because they didn't know where or what WTC7 was until it fell.

[BlakGlasses]

If you were also use logic, bombs couldn't have been used. Tower 1&2 started to fall at the point of impact, no where else. If bombs were set off to start it, why didnt it automatically blow and fall? Surely a jet that exploded on impact would set a chain reaction off of explosions resulting in an immediate collapse. No logic though huh? But I don't expect that from idiots like you guys.

[palasta]

@BlakGlasses

Hey, that is something rare to read. You've debunked yourself. Nice.

However... did this affect your overall opinion of the 911 event?

[BlakGlasses]

Also, building as fell due to fire alone. Search that and you'll see the steel structures have failed and collapsed. You'll only see concrete cores left, something that tower 1, 2 & 7 didn't have. Again, easy research can debunk these theories. Was once a theorist myself until I debunked myself. Easy shit bitches, research