Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Sartre 1 of 7

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
82,579
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 6, 2007

Life and Philosophy of Sartre

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @FrenchExpat1

    That's the point, idiot.

  • I think its cool how western philosophy in the 20th century has reached a similar understanding to concepts known to eastern philosophy for thousands of years

see all

All Comments (108)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • for those who do not know about Existentialism, this series will be fascinating...The influence of Sartre is profound.

  • Tous vos jugements prétendument scientifico-philosophiques, toutes vos remarques à l'endroit de Sartre, tous vos commentaires en somme, procèdent d'une ignorance totale du "socle"de la philosophie : vous salissez de votre orthographe approximative, de votre grammaire improbable une page qui devrait être réservée à ceux qui cherchent et aiment à penser, or vous y videz la substance noirâtre qui comble vos crânes. Gardez donc le silence et vos conseils ! A force d'en donner vous n'en aurez plus !

  • Doesn't scare me... strange that is does scare some... must stem from a loss of faith in old modes of thinking that i never had.

  • Sartre was blind in one eye (pun intended) and not able to accept biological, geographical, familial, cultural, environmental determinants which condition whatever freedoms we may assume.

    Not a science guy.

  • @mrfreudable

    txs. Have been ploughing through Satre, and gotten stuck on the victim-aggressor level/model. But yes, I agree that he meant we are free - but don't realize it.

    Especially like the phrase: " we are free but we're locked into a society that has already interpreted the world for us, without our consent."

    This makes one feel trapped - until it is seen that we swallowed this interpretation.

    We must set our own questions - and answer them, ourselves.

  • @lyfft I think Sartre meant that we are free but we don't realize it, i.e. we 're free to interpret the world absolutely any way we like. All values are changeable. Nothing is fixed. But the current society we live in passes ideas over as fact, unquestionable values. So yes we are free but we're locked into a society that has already interpreted the world for us, without our consent.

  • fucking commie

  • @SanGuevara All meaning/essence/purpose is subjective. In a universe without living creatures, meaning would not exist, as long as object that are not conscious (as far as we can tell), are not conscious.

  • Sartre just borrowed from other philosphers like Kierkegaard and Nietzsche. Nietzsche proclaimed man's freedom years earlier... 

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more