Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Fossil Found in Kitchen Counter

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
101,554
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 29, 2009

After a factory had found a 40-million-year-old whale fossil in a limestone kitchen counter, researchers investigated the stone's fossil-packed quarry, which could shed light on the origins of African wildlife.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @8Zeitgeist FINALLY! I am not the only one who thinks they are stupid.

  • @coolvideo28 Oh, I'm so glad you told me. My degree on Environmental Science was completely wrong. All that evidence for the Earth being well older than even 600 million years, let alone 6000, was just all imaginary and faked in a huge conspiracy. I see now that the Bible is true and accurate. Can't wait to tell the guys in the lab about this. They'll be so surprised.

see all

All Comments (721)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Does anyone else notice the way he says "Whale"

  • and a bone. But this is no rock, I've shown it around and everyone agrees its a bone, but to what animal? This vertebrae is at least 6 inches in diameter and maybe a little over 4 inches tall. I need to find out , however, if this thing is from a whale, which I believe, or perhaps another large creature, possibly extict, like a dinosaur. Either way, Im glad I found it and glad I did my part to preserve history.

  • I live up here in Williamsburg, Virginia by Waller Mill Lake. There are some creeks that flow into the lake, and I go there every now and then searching for fossils. I've found some shark teeth and some old bones but the most interesting item I discovered was a vertebrae of some sort of animal. It's obviously really old and preserved like a rock, but I've done volunteering with the Jamestown Archaeologists before and I've taken courses in geology at college, so I know the difference between rock

  • @coolvideo28 I apologise. I always thought I was a scientist that accepted the most likely conclusions based on the evidence I saw. Apparently all the evidence regarding evolution, even in my field alone, was just imaginary.

    Seriously, though, why couldn't you accept evolution for the evidence there is but still believe a god was the thing that set it in motion? You can have both without having to ignore science.

  • @boosie007666 I am shocked I am convercing with an evolutionist with a closed mind lol.

  • @coolvideo28 Oh yeah? I'll get right on that. Once I've finished my work as a 'fake' scientist, I'll have a look at what 'real' scientists are doing. I suppose they're spreading truth and showing real science with all their hard evidence derived from a book. No need to even do any work in the field, since it's already written down. Damn my university for providing a course on what they and everyone else believed was reality.

  • @boosie007666 The problem is that you have fallen for the millions of years lies. there is Not 1 single Scientific ...evol dating method, they are all circular reasoning based on a non existent geological column. If you use real Science not evol. Fairytale Nothing is older then approx. 6000 years old. That rock was romed because of the flood and that is how the whale got there.

  • @coolvideo28 South a whale died in a flood less than 6000 years ago and buried itself perfectly within a stone that takes millions of years to form? Yeah, makes sense.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more