The World Doesn't Want Capitalism: Anti-Capitalist Protests at the G-20 Summit
Top Comments
All Comments (182)
-
@SlavicFront88 We don't live in a capitalist society, if we did we would have free markets, but the markets are manipulated, if we lived in a true capitalist society the banks would not have been bailed out; when the state takes over the banks that is socialism not capitalism. get a financial education.
-
@AynManRand It's hard and I feel for you just as I feel for all of us. I can't say I have all the answers or the best answers, but I found a way that makes sense to me so far. All I know is we gotta all do our best to make this world better for all of us. I respect differences. Best wishes to you, things will get better.
-
@Dystopian420 We can probably agree that Corporations and the rich do not need subsidy of any kind. If they are to fail on their own then the flip side is that they must allowed as much of their profit as possible. Just laid off again and Im angry at every obstacle I see for survival being thrown at us. Today my girlfriend loses her car, displaced from operation by smog standards and now the city will fine us for storing the car in the driveway.
-
@Dystopian420 National Anarchism cant exist since Anarchy is the exact opposite of Nationalism. And with my other message, I was referring to the chapter revolution.
-
@moinsimion What does the U.S. and Taliban have to do with the manifesto or the group? All Anarchists of every kind are against both. National Anarchists want to live in cultural communities, they are against oppression, capitalism, consumerism, destruction of the planet and the annihilation of races/cultures through zionist and corporate agenda which reduces humanity to a grey skinned, consumerist cattle. Not sure what you are referring to. PM if you would like to discuss more.
-
@Dystopian420 "Outside of the US, and by most individuals that self-identify as anarchists, it implies a system of governance, mostly theoretical at a nation state level although there are a few successful historical examples that goes to lengths to avoid the use of coercion, violence, force and authority, while still producing a productive and desirable society." So a movement is not a problem.
-
@moinsimion not at all. edited to shorten it, from wiki, "In the US,"anarchy" typically is meant to refer to a society without a publicly/violently enforced government. When used in this sense, anarchy may or may not be intended to imply political disorder or lawlessness.
-
@Dystopian420 Ok, I read through it, I think you guys are thinking about the right things, but you are doing the wrong. Terrorists and murderers are what they are. Always and all over the world, no matter if US soldier or Taliban fighter.
-
@Dystopian420 oh, one more comment: Don't you find it weird to call a movement the national anarchist movement?
-
@Dystopian420 I know everything you have to know about anarchy, and of all the systems I would prefer it. But I dont see how Anarchy is achievable at this point in time. I will read the manifesto though, maybe there is something interesting in there.
Capitalism does work, it works perfectly well.. Unfortunately not for the people, but for egoistic bastards who will never care for their people.
Whether people want this system or not, it must be abolished.
SlavicFront88 8 months ago 9
@gitchigoomi Get a job? Did you say that to Tea Party protesters? After all, they were out on weekdays as well.
Ad hominem is employed when one cannot refute an argument. Good day, sir.
georgelopezblows 3 months ago 4