Lockheed Martin UCAV Sure Strike 2
Loading...
Loading...
28,396
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 9:12Lakeby Jacquisha4,016,608 views
- 0:47Lockheed Martin's Multiple Kill Vehicle (OLD)by jeffgooloolie114,556 views
- 2:38Boeing Phantom Ray UCAVby theworacle82,950 views
- 2:25PREDATOR DRONE - ( MILITARY CARD COMMERCIAL )by banetek51,980 views
- 1:54E D I UCAV HAWX Modby impala8842,383 views
- 2:40HULCby LockheedMartinVideos699,076 views
- 7:52MEADSby LockheedMartinVideos15,841 views
- 3:25Lockheed Martin Morphing Droneby ValleeMichel9,285 views
- 1:22Saab ucav sharc filurby signatory4,947 views
- 4:14FSX FJ3by Zlin003524,218 views
- 1:10LM's JLTVby seanmeade75,004 views
- 4:20Lockheed Martin X-35by jestan0189,267 views
- 0:59MQ-9 Reaper, Predator B UAVby AmericaMDCCLXXVI417,660 views
- 3:15Strange planes- Future seriesby wenjie639918,803 views
- 2:34The tanks in futureby FISAIDRAGAN138,487 views
- 5:23X-45A/UCAV Project Overview and Autonomous Form...by ZeroScam17,093 views
- 0:23Lockheed Martin RQ-3 DarkStarby 74flateric66,581 views
- 1:02China UAV taxiing on a runwayby speak4pla481 views
- 0:41Lockheed Cormorant unmanned aircraftby theworacle25,645 views
- 1:08Skunk Works multi-purpose UAVby jucjuc128,660 views
In Google: Airborne aerial unmanned bulletproof combat drone of monitoring system.
000vortex 2 months ago
when was this video made? 1994?
spoonslap 5 months ago
@lokeshthebeast It must be a secured comunication, because these UCAV's r not intended 2 be used against insurgents with now SAM capability only. They're intended 2 be used against major powers as well. THIS is the technology US should focus on, if u ask me, not the useless F-35. They should cancel the F-35 and focus the funds on UCAVs only. F-35 is useless & it also costs a lot of money.
StiviGun1 11 months ago
do anyone know what kinda antenna will be used in ucav and and ucav communicates with ground control and satellite?
also secure communication?
lokeshthebeast 2 years ago
yup..really it does,the heart of reinch....the nazi soldier and the kamikaze will won the WW2...
lagendarock92 2 years ago
@bnther36
Bhah - secured datalinks? You mean that one?
guardian. co. uk/technology/2009/dec/17/skygrabber-software-drones-hacked
MarshallJukov 2 years ago
Wrong!
It's all about the commander's strategery!
noodleninjaa 2 years ago
Your absolutely right. There are many MANY factors that contribute to victory.
My biggest concern with UAV's stems from the way people tend to embrace them as somehow superior than a piloted combat vehicle. I'm not implying that UAV's do not posses certain advantages over their human counter parts. But technology is ever evolving. What the military thinks is secure data-links today, might be hacked tomorrow. Whereas a soldier fights with passion, regardless of his technological status.
bnther36 2 years ago
pfff, heart of the soldier^^ But let me correct myself... Its also about numbers and geographics (to some degree). But If you are absolutely superior in technology you are sure to dominate the battlefield.
However, the "heart of the soldier" does has a lot to say when it comes to gaining good reputation among the people in an area you want to control, cannot do that with a bunch of soldiers without good ethics and morale:O
libbern 2 years ago
Wrong!
If that were true Nazi Germany would have won.
It's all about the heart of the soldier.
bnther36 2 years ago