Larry King and Sarah Palin on Approval Voting

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
637 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 3, 2010

"Larry King" and "Sarah Palin" discuss approval voting and compare it to plurality voting.

Steven Brams on approval voting: http://bigthink.com/ideas/18726

Video comparing voting systems: http://www.teach12.com/ttcx/VotingFreeLecture.aspx

Voting systems in general: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-winner_voting_system

Nonpartisan organization dedicated to voting theory, The Center for Election Science: http://www.electology.org/

More on Voting systems: http://rangevoting.org/

Complexity: 1/4
Requires curiosity only

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (burningice17)

  • If there are enough questions in the comments section, I may make another video addressing those questions specifically in a Q & A between "King" and "Sarah". Other issues may include bullet voting, mediocre winners, majority criterion, Arrow's Impossibility Theorem, or others. I can easily handle any of these topics. I apologize for the voices. Feedback is appreciated.

see all

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Approval Voting is much better than we have now, but it's not my favorite. My preference is for an Instant Round Robin (Condorcet) method with a hybrid tiebreaker using the Smith Set, Approval votes, and first place votes.

    I'm not sold on range voting, but it makes more sense than Plurality. As for Approval, I'd take it over Plurality any day, and also over Instant Runoff (which is one of the only voting methods worse than Plurality).

  • Not bad!

    I think the best description of Approval Voting I've heard has been this: "With Approval Voting, you get to cast a YES or NO vote for all candidates ... With Plurality Voting, you get to cast a YES vote for one candidate."

    Great point on the "spoiler" issue and the same voting machines.

    I'd use examples of races for governor and Senate. That way you avoid complicating issues - i.e. the Electoral College for the presidential race, and redistricting for Congressional races.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more