Miami TD catch vs UCLA (1998)

Fulcher TD catch in 49-45 win over UCLA in 1998.

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• Miami
• Hurricanes
• Football
• UCLA

[BCEagle73]

@conni70 that's not true at all. Miami has 5 NC's, GT has 4 NC's, FSU has two NC's, Maryland has two NC's and Clemson has one NC which brings the total of 14 NC's, which is more than 11. Ain't too bad for a b-ball conference.

[longlivethe80s]

can you tell what the SEC's record is against the PAC-10?

[m2diggs]

hey I agree with you,USC is has been way more successful than Miami has just like Miami has been way more successful than UCLA has.before you use Miami playing in the pathetic big east as an argument.let me remind you that Miami won 4 national titles playing as an independent...beating the likes of Notre Dame,FSU,Oklahoma,Florida,Nebr­aska.

Face it,Miami is better than you Bruins in the game of football.read an almanac for proof.UCLA better in basketball,Miami better in Football.

Case closed

[conni70]

if want to bring up history that's fine...UCLA is my team but from a historical perspective USC has won more national titles than any ACC school in history...USC has 11 national titles that's more by one school than all ACC teams combined...in addition, count the other 5 collectively by Cal, Ucla and Stanford and the ACC isn't in the same class as the Pac 10...but lets talk about the last 7 years too, in which the Pac 10 has sent more guys to the NFL than any other conference in college football

[m2diggs]

Retard when did i accuse you of saying the PAC 10 was better.I was just giving you an example.there's tougher competition in the SEC and yet they produce different national champions...the PAC 10 doesn't.

[conni70]

hey asshole, i never said the Pac 10 was better than the SEC...in addition, i never said the ACC sucked either... but what i did say was that the PAC 10 is better than the ACC... and you're the one talkin shit, saying the PAC 10 sucks...to utter such words elucidates a very low football IQ on your part...anyone who knows anything about college football knows that the PAC 10 is an elite conference...

[m2diggs]

The last team other than USC to win a national title from the PAC 10 was UCLA back in 1954.one champion to come out of your elite conference in the past 55 years.

ACC on the other hand has produced since 54?drum roll please!!!

Miami(5),Clemson(1),G-Tech(1) and FSU(2)

what conference is better?

[m2diggs]

Not our fault you can't compete.not our fault USC gets the spotlight and recruits better than you peons.

We were winning national titles not too long ago beating powerhouses like Notre Dame(when they were great),FSU(when they were great),Florida and Oklahoma.and lets not forget Nebraska when they were coach by the all great Tom Osbourne.

I know it's sad they your team sucks but hey don't take it out on mine.

[m2diggs]

The all mighty Pac 10! wow!!!!

Tell me something genius,if the Pac 10 is so great, than why is it that USC is the only team thats won a national title in the past I don't know zillion years,meanwhile the rest or you can't win shit!

the SEC which many consider the best conference has produced 3 different national champions in the past 11 years(FLA,TENN,LSU).might be 4 with Alabama this year.

The PAC 10 ain't shit.fuck you and the WACK 10!

[conni70]

your teams conference is reflected on their record, you jerk... if UCLA played Duke, Boston College and Virginia every year they would have a better record, don't you think? your conference is mediocre compared to the Pac 10... that's my point, you jack ass...UCLA won all their non conference games the last two years, with all their losses coming within the conference...put UCLA in the ACC and i promise you they finish with a better record...