The whole reason there was a council of Nicea was because different Christian factions were in existence - they each believed in/emphasized certain parts of His life and not others. In addition, by this time many different books/epistles/etc about the life of Jesus had been penned. The Council of Nicea was created in order to establish an organized religion for the Roman state because they had an emperor who made Christianity the official one. The existence of Jesus came before the council.
If you're going to say there is no historical record of a man named Jesus, then by automatic extension, if there is any record of any historian mentioning Christ is illegitimate. Slippery slope there.
your opinion freely when asked, but you have to be very careful when you start trying to influence others of your beliefs through preaching and creating multimedia messages because if you're incorrect in any of your assertions, then you are holder of the responsibility of leading minds astray.
What this dude is saying about the Nicean Council is true, but he does not address the council of Laodecia which detailed the many books and texts the church at the time felt should no longer be considered canon which included texts with many quotes from Jesus. Modern Christianity and the early Christian church differ greatly. There is so much to research concerning Christianity and its origins, and other religions, and spirituality. It's fine to have an opinion and to express your
"nobody from the 1st, 2nd, 3rd centuries said anything about somebody called Jesus' says "Dr." Hagin....well except for Josephus and Tacitus, probably the two most prominent 1st century historians. It's very easy for some clown like Hagin to make a 2nd rate slideshow and make uneducated claims that Jesus didn't exist. Most idiots won't check him on it simply because he says "look it up and prove me wrong". He is proven wrong. He cannot prove that Jesus didn't exist.
@AlignmentPictures I have researched this. There is A LOT of evidence that says that Jesus did exist. There are manuscripts of Jewish writers (i.e. critics of Jesus and Christianity) who don't refute his miracles, they just claim that he got his power from Satan. Notice that they didn't refute that he did do these miracles. "Dr." Hagin's proof is him saying that Jesus didn't exist, he gives no evidence except his opinion. I insult him because he's an uninformed clown leading people astray
@HoodstarMoTg007 Anno Domini - In The Year of Our Lord
ThaKang76 5 months ago
what stands AD for ? please someone clarify me
HoodstarMoTg007 5 months ago
Arius didn't say that Jesus didn't exist. He only argued that the Father was divine over the Son - that Jesus was the subordinate of the Godhead.
tealvsturquoise 5 months ago
The whole reason there was a council of Nicea was because different Christian factions were in existence - they each believed in/emphasized certain parts of His life and not others. In addition, by this time many different books/epistles/etc about the life of Jesus had been penned. The Council of Nicea was created in order to establish an organized religion for the Roman state because they had an emperor who made Christianity the official one. The existence of Jesus came before the council.
tealvsturquoise 5 months ago
@dnga99 shawnlandis(Dot)suite101(Dot) com/pliny-tacitus-josephus-and-jesus-a28707
hier222 5 months ago
If you're going to say there is no historical record of a man named Jesus, then by automatic extension, if there is any record of any historian mentioning Christ is illegitimate. Slippery slope there.
bandoogiemanz 6 months ago
your opinion freely when asked, but you have to be very careful when you start trying to influence others of your beliefs through preaching and creating multimedia messages because if you're incorrect in any of your assertions, then you are holder of the responsibility of leading minds astray.
bandoogiemanz 6 months ago
What this dude is saying about the Nicean Council is true, but he does not address the council of Laodecia which detailed the many books and texts the church at the time felt should no longer be considered canon which included texts with many quotes from Jesus. Modern Christianity and the early Christian church differ greatly. There is so much to research concerning Christianity and its origins, and other religions, and spirituality. It's fine to have an opinion and to express your
bandoogiemanz 6 months ago
"nobody from the 1st, 2nd, 3rd centuries said anything about somebody called Jesus' says "Dr." Hagin....well except for Josephus and Tacitus, probably the two most prominent 1st century historians. It's very easy for some clown like Hagin to make a 2nd rate slideshow and make uneducated claims that Jesus didn't exist. Most idiots won't check him on it simply because he says "look it up and prove me wrong". He is proven wrong. He cannot prove that Jesus didn't exist.
dnga99 7 months ago
@AlignmentPictures I have researched this. There is A LOT of evidence that says that Jesus did exist. There are manuscripts of Jewish writers (i.e. critics of Jesus and Christianity) who don't refute his miracles, they just claim that he got his power from Satan. Notice that they didn't refute that he did do these miracles. "Dr." Hagin's proof is him saying that Jesus didn't exist, he gives no evidence except his opinion. I insult him because he's an uninformed clown leading people astray
dnga99 7 months ago