Christopher Hitchens vs. Dinesh D'Souza, debate at CU-Boulder (Part 5 of 13)
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (70)
-
Hitchens raped Dinesh. Dinesh couldn't even come close to touching that argument.
-
you know I could have said that ...LOL
-
Dinesh is the corniest mofo I have ever seen Hitch debate.
-
To be fair, if they were educated, they probably wouldn't be creationists.
-
Hitchens is right. The Indian baboon is a nut.
-
1. owned? - where?
2. as usual? - really?
-
He's a good debater, for sure, but his arguments don't make any more sense than those of most other apologists.
-
I wouldn't say D'Souza is a buffoon. I think he's as wrong as you do, but as Mr. Hitchens as said, he's probably the most formidable apologist of religion around.
-
' "Baboons, however, aren't moral agents"
Oh, really? What makes you an authority able to make that claim? '
Oh, don't tempt me...
Oh please, D'Souza is just another classic ignoramus on homo sapiens history... Can't they give Hitchens some educated person to debate?
AmerginMacEccit 3 years ago 7
It seems that Dinesh don't have knowledge of history. Hi tries to disable the point of HItchens, asking why did not humankind developed as quick as it has done in the recent centuries. The reason is; only in the past century, humans left the spooky explanaintions behind and began to gather knowledge in a systematic way, namely with the scientific method, which is not an invention of Christianity or any other religion.
deepgehirn 2 years ago 3