Geoffrey Warnock on Kant: Section 5
Loading...
Link to this comment:
Top Comments
All Comments (52)
-
@LooksAeterna Welcome to my parlour.
-
@stonemanrichard So you suggest that if you engage in argument free, disingenious superiority rhetoric, this would somehow distract from the inappropriateness of your original comment ? You need stupid readers to swallow that. Try a Britney Spears video.
-
@LooksAeterna Less talk. More digging.
-
@stonemanrichard What a speaker means to say is not open to another's preferences.
-
@LooksAeterna I'll stick with the gerund. Here's the shovel; keep digging.
-
@stonemanrichard Yes, if it is an expression of ignorance or some other neglect. That's why I felt I had to retort a little.
What I meant with "Insulting arrogance" above, though, is not "insulting another's arrogance" but "[one's own] arrogance [that is also] insulting".
-
@LooksAeterna It is often necessary to instult arrogance. 2/10
-
@stonemanrichard (cond.)
... which is of course total folly because the dominating learned languages at the time were either French or Latin which would have resulted in far greater obstacles.
Please think before you write. Instulting arrogance is always somewhat ugly, even if necessary to correct someone, but it is particularly ridiculous if it expresses a lack of education such as in your case.
-
@stonemanrichard It seems normal these days for half-educated people to use insulting attacks on a person in order to substitute for arguments. You seem to follow the Zeitgeist in this respect.
But Magee's words were "It's a huge UNNECESSARY obstacle" - when just a moment before Warnock pointed out how the circumstances WERE in fact such that the obstacle was necessarily there ! The only logical way to justify Magee's judgement is to assume that he should naturally have resorted to English ...
-
No, he is not. Either there is something seriously wrong with your understanding, or you need to have your ears syringed.
6:08J.P. Stern on Nietzsche: Section 5by flame043020,280 views
- 5:29Hilary Putnam on the Philosophy of Science: Sec...by flame043023,812 views
- 5:01Peter Singer on Hegel and Marx: Section 5by flame043021,999 views
- 6:26Ayer on Frege and Russell: Section 5by flame043010,493 views
- 9:31Anthony Quinton on Ludwig Wittgenstein: Section 2by flame043019,748 views
- 10:44Geoffrey Warnock on Kant: Section 4by flame043016,907 views
- 5:54Anthony Kenny on Medieval Philosophy: Section 5by flame043012,462 views
- 8:09Martha Nussbaum on Aristotle: Section 3by flame043020,759 views
- 10:45Miles Burnyeat on Plato: Section 4by flame043024,081 views
- 6:09Frederick Copleston on Schopenhauer: Section 5by flame043015,328 views
- 9:33IMMANUEL KANT : CRITIQUE OF PURE REASONby Winchesterjournalism26,745 views
- 10:38J.P. Stern on Nietzsche: Section 3by flame043026,450 views
- 9:21Martha Nussbaum on Aristotle: Section 1by flame043069,811 views
- 10:24Ayer on Frege and Russell: Section 1by flame043052,282 views
- 7:59Michael Ayers on Locke and Berkeley: Section 1by flame043020,425 views
- 9:25Geoffrey Warnock on Kant: Section 3by flame043021,549 views
- 7:10Peter Singer on Hegel and Marx: Section 4by flame043022,345 views
- 8:53Anthony Quinton on Ludwig Wittgenstein: Section 1by flame043034,999 views
- 8:25Geoffrey Warnock on Kant: Section 2by flame043029,317 views
- 10:37J.P. Stern on Nietzsche: Section 2by flame043037,282 views
"Hmmm, yes, indeed, hmmmm, yes"
It's so very British, I love it.
bradh57 2 years ago 26
flame0430, 5 stars for both you and the video!
mrfatd 3 years ago 23