'Persistent Contrails' forming cirrus clouds = weather modification.
Uploader Comments (philwarinsky)
Video Responses
All Comments (11)
-
it isnt it though, i thought so. Scattering is the geoengineering terminology for particle disbersal.
Etymology is important, its the science of "accdepted" terminology, even the word "gobblgook" is in it. But not chemtrails.
when tourture is made ok by calling it 'special interogation techniques' you start to get the picture of how this works.if you dont put chemtrail in your title, you most likely wont get a chemtard character assasin on your post, if you do you will. Its a catch word THEY use
-
yeah @ 30'000 feet above the earth, oh accept at the poles. how long would a cloud persist at 30'000 feet?
Where you might see a 'condensation"(water based trail) forming from the ultra low temps founds at high altitude. All the original 'condensation' "Contrails" evaporated and did not persist for hours & hours, that is a blatant research error. In ww2 trails r used for military/airforce purposes as an atmospheric obscurification- simple. Geoengineers scatter trails are persistent contrails.
-
Brisbane people .. wake up .. see the sky !!!
They are not genuine clouds at all .. they hang around the sun, like very white thick spongy carpet filler .. I would post the videos later on .. definitely major sprays .. i got up very early in the morning and I heard a few planes flying around ... From my videos, I think you could tell the difference between the real clouds and those chemical filled sponge. The clouds dispersed like as they move, but the chemtrails become disjointed marks
-
anutarasamyat,
This is incorrect. Persistent contrails are NOT new. They were first observed in the 1920's and were prominent during WW2. The US bombers had to fly very high in the sky to avoid being spotted. Persistent contrails were a bane for the bombers, giving away their presence as well as pointing out their flight path.
Google - "persistent contrails ww2" for pictures of grids, X's and circular contrails from 1945.
-
5 ***** example of how the some of the sprayed aerosols/chemicals react in the atmosphere. After all these years I'll never get used to this oddity, of how they not only persist but billow out like that. Many times I've seen just ONE thin trail spread and turn a clear blue sky completely overcast from horizon to horizon! Peace.
-
Bastards should be shot!
-
This is Sydney Australia and ONE trail. Of all the flights that pass over this major AU capital WHY only one trail? This fact alone should arouse the suspicions of the sceptic. SIGN THE PETITION!
Well done Phil.
The term..'persistent contrail' in and of itself only became part of the vernacular because they only came into existence a decade ago. Before that a contrail was a contrail...they didn't 'persist' past about 30 seconds. Now, the new term 'persistent' was added to confuse and spread disinformation. Period.
anutarasamyat 2 years ago
Agreed - am I confusing the term do you think?
Thanks mate.
philwarinsky 2 years ago
NO NO NO it isn't you, it was the government boys who needed a term that sort of explained why they hung around for hours. If we start using the term, in a way we spread the lie...a persistent contrail is a con on the term itself. There are still contrails, and then there are these poisonous spray trails.
anutarasamyat 2 years ago
We are on the same page - good stuff. That is my understanding...
philwarinsky 2 years ago
This is kind of a tricky issue. I think I understand your reluctance to call them "chemtrails". Because "they" have been quite successful at treating the word with derision and ridicule in the same way as the mention of "conspiracy" makes some people's eyes roll, as if there's never ever been a conspiracy and how stupid you are for even thinking about it. At least if you say "persistant contrails" they HAVE to aknowledge these new clouds. Say "chemtrails" and you're dismissed instantly. I dunno
glazinq 2 years ago
That is my thinking. 'Persistent contrails' sits kinda in the middle. The worshiped Media uses the term so we are afforded a degree of assumed correctness, this together with a good argument and we can layout a 'sane' argument for at least questioning what we are seeing.
philwarinsky 2 years ago