Romerouk/Muller bucking coils, parallel cap and resonance

Another experiment with Romerouk/Muller device. One coil in bucking configuration and parallel capacitor. Shorting DC side of FWBR has no effect on rpm. I used 22 LED lamp which is designed to work on 4.5V and draws 50mA in this setup. I've been trying several AC caps as well as re adjusting rotor - coil distance which is very important. Also, moving Bloch Wall within the coils. This is not as simple as it appeared to me at first. Very sensitive and tons of patience required. My hat off to Romerouk and everyone working on ths device.

Thanks for watching
V

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• romerouk
• Muller
• Energetic Forum

[jozsab1]

very nice build. Any chance to throw in some efficiency numbers ? Input to output conversion rate ? Just so that on the next video it gets a proper progress comparison.

lol what an epic reply " BTW, I'm not a member of OU and have no idea who is Bolt." User2718218 bumps every post that has Muller word in it. Be prepared he will stalk you to convince you ti will never work. Some people have a lot of time to waste on reading videos they think it's useless to watch ( get it ? ;) )

[blackchisel97]

@jozsab1 There is no point of any comparison yet. RPM needs to be controlled and I can get anywhere between 1100 - 3500 atm. Input will vary accordingly from 80mA - 350mA. Output from one coil can be between 2.5V up to 15.5V. I'm powering from 12V lead acid battery. Too many variables and I need to find a balance first. I don't want to waste a band space with meaningless clips but will update when I find what matters most.

Thanks

[User2718218]

Nice build. For days even weeks the boys on OU have been talking about coil shorting and adding caps in search of resonance and 90 degree phase shifts. This is all nonsense talk in the blind belief that one of these properties is related to OU. The truth is that NONE of these things are related to OU and you are collectively leading yourselves down a garden path because of misplaced blind faith in these concepts. You can fiddle around forever and you won't get closer to OU.

[blackchisel97]

@User2718218 Thank you for your suggestions. I follow my intuition trying to figure this out one way or another. I realized tonight that RPM, rotor - coil distance and biasing magnets can do the job without the cap. My setup isn't close enough to the original and there are many things unknown to me. BTW, I'm not a member of OU and have no idea who is Bolt.

Regards

V

[User2718218]

@blackchisel97 You have fun with your motor but things will definitely go the "other" way. Following your intuition sounds great. The basic things to realize are that the pulse motor setup that drives the rotor is under unity by definition. The generator coils are conventional and under unity by definition. The user Wattsup on the overunityresearch web site has found video frame evidence that Romero cheated with extra wires and a battery but the OU crowd is in denial.

[blackchisel97]

@User2718218 You sound like a prophet but I'm not a religious person. As I said before, I listen to my intuition and trust my eyes, not to what others saw or believe is truth or not. You keep referring to people I never met and it seems you have a problem with OU members which is your personal matter. Why you decided to tell me about that remains mysterious. And yes, motors are under COP-1.

V

[ericsclips]

@User2718218

I see you posting such large amounts of comments in so many of these replications - obsessive? Agenda? Paid? You're comments can hardly be considered constructive. Go away. I'm tired of seeing your username in the comments of these replications. Seeing your repetitive bullshit is such a travesty that I want to comment, simple as that.

[jozsab1]

@User2718218 I personally was visited once by MIB(not related to generators).

Yes, obviously the forum is full of people that are experimenters and not professionals. Like me. And there are others.

Apart from all this, bumping any video that has a specific name in it with the same non constructive comment is called trolling. And i mean your comments for flaming specific users or expressing non technical opinions. You did put some interesting questions but that hardly makes you constructive.

[User2718218]

@jozsab1 As far as your alleging that I am paid to post here don't make me laugh. You are all grown men in the thread and yet you believe in the MIB bogeyman like a bunch of five-year-olds. It's just so ridiculous. Romero faked this nonsense for his mental masturbation and now you have Bolt in a similar role spouting nonsense for his own mental masturbation. I have a technical background and seeing this idiocy in action is such a travesty that I want to comment, simple as that.

[User2718218]

@jozsab1 Actually it's more like this: The vast majority of people in the thread including the replicators have almost no education or experience with motors or electronics. The average person there can not even compare to a smart kid that passed his grade eight physics class. Therefore Bolt can spout all sorts of nonsensical gibberish about motors and electronics and you all gobble it up like empty-headed vessels that need to be filled with something.

[User2718218]

3rd: Going back to the OU gang, the person that is REALLY SCREWING UP THE THREAD is BOLT. Bolt is telling you all nonsensical technical mumbo-jumbo talk that sounds cool to somebody that doesn't know better but the truth is that it is all crap, 95% at least. BOLT IS FULL OF SHIT AND YOU SHOULD STOP LISTENING TO HIS CRAP.

Here is how to challenge Bolt: Next time he makes the VSWR speech then insist that he produce a circuit and a TIMING DIAGRAM to back up his words. Watch him CRUMBLE.