Super Match III - Roger Federer VS Rafael Nadal
Top Comments
All Comments (63)
-
and its about winning against everybody not just having a good record against one guy.
/\ totally agree to you......................its about having a good record against the herd.
-
Federer Made Nadal Better Each Time They Played, Nadal Still Learning From Every Match Against The BEst IN History !
-
@thulithuli lol only reason nadal is so good is cos federer made him so good, no one has ever been as good as federer nadal knows this and works his ass off and credit to him but without federer there the nadal we know would not exist. and + straight sets are you fucking stupid?( obviously) they both played amazing in wimb 2008 feds came back from 2 sets down two tie breaks dont think tht lucky its called tennis.
-
nadal was def very lucky, losing more points in the first two
-
Actually, people are stupid alot of times.
-
@thulithuli that's true. which is proof of what a funk federer was in. do you really think federer at 100% would struggle to win a set on grass?
-
@butterflycaught900 lolll give it up he was lucky he dint lose the 2008 final in straights
-
People are so stupid sometimes, Federer and Nadal are both amazing players, I admit I prefer Federer but to prefer one of these two players is not a reason to say the other (Nadal) is a "dirt rat" or (Federer) an "over old man".
Just look at this video, the two of them are great and they look like they're having fun playing against each other (they smile a lot =D).
-
first of all, your english is way off. i gathered by the few intelligible words you strung together that you don't like nadal. well tough luck. a lot of ppl do, including feds and most of the other atp players.
also those "high loopy balls" are him putting more spin on his ball. do you know that rafa hits his balls, lol, with 500 more revolutions than anyone else? maybe that does indeed frustrate his opponents, but that IS tennis regardless.
next
-
@asher29886 its won him alot of grands so he doesnt care and y should u
so what if he won wimbledon when fed was in a major form funk. plenty of people beat him in 2008, nadal would have had no chance if fed played half as good as he did in 06 or 07. at one point he lost 5 games in a row. and he still only lost 9-7 in the 5th. and btw hes only beaten him on grass ONCE (barely). whereas federer has beaten nadal in 2 clay finals, even bageled him once. and its about winning against everybody not just having a good record against one guy.
butterflycaught900 2 years ago 11
best player of the year ....best player of the modern era ...best player ever
ROGER FEDERER
MSA3ID 3 years ago 9