Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

October 10th: A Spoilerific Attack on Unicorns

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
53,861
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 10, 2007

WARNING THIS VIDEO CONTAINS HP7 SPOILERS

Vote for your favorite books at the Inky Awards if you're under 25: http://www.insideadog.com.au/inkys/index.php

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 24 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • JOHN, get your harry potter straight. It was not the UNICORN BLOOD that kept him alive but his HORCRUXES. He didn't need the unicorn blood to stay alive and, quite certainly, he could have regained his body without it since the potion/spell he used did not require the blood of a unicorn. He drank the unicorn blood to regain strength while in his temporary body (both with Quirrel and creepy baby body).

    So yeah, YOUR ARGUMENT IS INVALID.

  • Equally, you have to remember that there were zombie-like creatures in the cave with the fake horcrux/locket. If Dumbledore hadn't had to save Harry from them he may have had enough power to get back to Hogwarts and be saved by Snape before getting defeated by Malfoy. So mabey zombies caused Tonks to die, starting by killing Dumbledore...

see all

All Comments (762)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • weeeeelll actually Harry is behind Voldermort living, along with the other horcruxes. So I guess its harrys fault?

  • i dont support unicorns, i AM a unicorn :D (hence my name being charlie, lol)

  • "And all they do in Harry Potter is save villains"

    WHAT!? Voldermort KILLED THEM to DRINK THEIR BLOOD! It's not like they were all "Hey Voldy want some fresh, grade A unicorn blood? It'll help you defeat Harry. Just slaughter me and you can have all that you want."

    It's like saying Voldermort living in the first place was Harry's fault because he became a horcrux...

  • @TookItHomeToJenny I think it was neccesary for Dumbledore to die in order for good to eventually triumph over Voldemort. I'm not sure Dumbledore would have allowed Snape to save him

  • I'm not a fan of George Bush. But if he could transform into a car at will I might have to revise my opinion a bit.

  • I love that you just use tonks. nobody seems to care about her

  • I don't know about you guys, but I'm Switzerland in this war.

  • @TookItHomeToJenny you are because you are assuming that the entire battle for Hogwarts could have been avoided if Dumbledore had lived, which it more than probably couldn't have, it would only have been delayed until Voldermort realised Harry was after the horcruxes., he attacks,Dolohov kills Remus, Tonks goes to her death, what could Dumbledore have done?

  • @Foolishyhuman Who is the fool? Dumbledore, Lupin, Tonks or me?

  • @TookItHomeToJenny so Dumbledore could have stopped Remus' death? Cause she went to her death following that. Foolish fool.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more