AMD Cores: "Bulldozer" and "Bobcat"
Top Comments
All Comments (749)
-
@dodoslovensko i would say intel 2011 socket i7 3960X is best :)
-
You must endlasting learn more about somthing... And how do you explain why gamers are happy with the PS3 or Xbox with a small ~ 30 FPS NTSC? 25 or 30 frames per second are not a big difference, you can see that even if I record with Fraps a video of 30 or 25 FPS.
-
AMD is introducing failure in long term, i honestly given AMD enough chances and years and was a fan because it was cheap and good for me, but after buying testing and i saw at friends the fall i'm running from this name forever, they will fail all the time, i'm back in intel and nVidia no way i will give more chance for this rubbish, seriously they are trying to compete with intel 4 and 6 cores with new 8 core, try beating the same category for f**k sake.
-
@StevensiTX make more research before commenting such things, you are underestimating the human eye, no gamer would play in 25 FPS the divx movies in 23 and 25 fps are bad enough.
-
so what is better 4 mee 2011 or buldozer ?
i play games+edit HD video on one machine.
-
Yes Games use mainy GPU as CPU power.
Slow Game these days means slow graphics card, formerly it was just different.
-
More CPU MIPS per clock (e.g. Athlon xxx vs. P4) it's more efficient and has with high GHz clocks a ultamate performance like never before, yea thats a Bulldozer. I still hope really the improved version of the Bulldozer core is again like a Atlhon XP vs. P4 (core i).
-
above 25 FPS are enough for the eye
-
@thecam4444This CPU architecture shouldn't even be used in phones. Let alone Gaming...
@csoty33 Immature comebacks don't make your overpriced Intel Processor perform any better.
0oDarkLordRevano0 5 months ago 24
"Bulldozer is engineered for performance and scalability..."
Guess that AMD's engineers have a diferent concept of those than their customers...
reztekado 3 months ago 8