David Berlinski - Evolution destroyed in under 5 minutes

No description available.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• David
• Berlinski
• Evolution
• destroyed
• in
• under
• 5
• minutes

[billynotv]

@CrapnellGates

Google: Dissent from Darwinism

[zenithar6666]

unless asserted? no, its called following the evidence, occams razor clearly says that design is the obvious answer, come on,

there is no evidence for the origin, evolution and co evolution of molecular machines, processes, sex, morphogenesis, embryology, dna repair, circadian clocks, meiosis, cytokinesis, sperm egg interactions, proteasome...only utter speculation, read before you write back to me,

to simply invoke miracle after miracle is not an answer, only incredulity,

[mehico33]

@Jitpring Disinformation ought to be opposed otherwise it remains free to mislead, don't you agree?

If you were to tell me water is composed of 4 parts helium and 1 part lithium that wouldn't be heresy, it would be stupidity and I would correct you. Admittedly this particular subject has come to symbolize something deeper, which is rather childish.

[mehico33]

@zenithar6666 Design does not enter the picture unless asserted. Occams razor my friend, besides the fact that none of those mechanisms/processes yield any evidence against evolution theory but aid in the argument from personal incredulity. "logic" does not add up to what is intuitive, it adds up to what works in a blunt mechanistic sense.

Creationism falls at simple hurdles e.g. geographical dispensation, appearance of relation (e.g. mammal family, reptile family... a branching tree)

[Jitpring]

It's amusing to see the evangelical atheists here so annoyed about this heresy.

[CrapnellGates]

I like how he keeps appealing to this notion of "Serious Scientists"

Thousands of scientists world wide promote and endorse biological evolution via natural selection. An overwhelming majority in fact....I mean...who are these "Serious Scientists"?

[zenithar6666]

my above statement still stands, if you disagree, do the research on the topics i have said, then look into mitosis, meiosis, cytokinesis, flowering plant reproduction etc and then you will see that speculation is the basis of the theory,. and i don't put out wild assertion or follow any book, I simply follow the evidence to the most logical and viable conclusion, design, by whom, what? i don't pretend to know

[CableLizard]

2:40 because your brain can process only 9% of what is happening around you.

[mehico33]

@zenithar6666 Jesus, is your keyboard broken?

To call it idiocy is false and downright slanderous, Evolution is very much a viable and workable theory (to say nothing of the fact that it is the only one) backed up by evidence. If you have access to google you have no right to remain in the dark.

The evidence may not be bulletproof but it is infinitely better than an ancient book or wild assertion

[SendInTheChickens]

this is ridiculous - he attempts to dismiss the theory of evolution on the basis that it should be clear to us how it works, in full detail, and that hunches are no basis for science. might i point out to those watching this right now in ignorance, that heliocentrism took almost 1800 years to reveal itself fully (compared to only 250 so far for evolution), and was first posited in the form of - guess what - a hunch, by aristarchus around 220 BC. hunches are how ALL scientific discovery begins.