Slavery in St. Louis County, MN?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
11,442
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 3, 2007

St. Louis County (MN) Commissioner Keith Nelson explains how he would vote on slavery if given the choice.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (128)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • WOW I can not believe that people would actually use this video to attempt to turn voters against Mr. Nelson! Clearly the title does NOT match the context. The message of Mr.Nelsons speech is that he works for his constituents and THAT is exactly what a representative is supposed to be doing. He was not in anyway wrong, and never did he say he was for slavery. He said he is for his constituents so stop taking his words out of context. I'm VERY glad Keith Nelson was re-elected again in 2010.

  • Can anyone say Trustee?

  • First off Cottonman, you live in Cotton. Your 60 years old watching YouTube. Second off, the issue here was the smoking ban, he was against it because his people voted against it, and if his people voted for it then he would vote for it. I know with your education thats hard to understand but what he is trying to say is that he represents his people. If your soo much better then run against him, I dare you.

  • He is not the the one who brought it up, another commissioner asked him... If the issue were slavery, and if his constituents voted for it then would he represent themjob. He said he would because that is his JOB, his job is to represent his people.

  • Nelson was indeed wrong, but not the brightest penny in the pocket it's not an uncommon phenomenon.

    Constitution-based federal republic; strong democratic tradition

    Cia Fact Book United States Government

    Federal Constitutional Republic

    Wikipedia United States

  • You might consider him your leader, but he was elected to represent his constituents.

  • The context was how far would you go in your rationale that you are doing this because your constituents want it. Would you do something obviously wrong and evil. The answer he gave was yes. This is about leadership vs representation and whether the individual leader has sufficient values to sort wrong from right. He made it clear he does not.

  • You are wrong! We live in a representative Republic!

    No where in our Constitution or the Declaration of Independence, nor in the constitutions of the fifty states will you find the word"democracy."

  • Good! i'm glad someone is sticking to their job. he can vote for it all he wants if his constituents want it. that is what we pay them to do.

  • I wish he had used a more convincing issue than slavery... I thought we were a century or two beyond that. Seems he isn't, or at the very least has problems trying to enunciate sarcasm.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more