Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Slavery in St. Louis County, MN?

St. Louis County (MN) Commissioner Keith Nelson explains how he would vote on slavery if given the choice.  
 
Customize

More From: natebobc

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

25 ratings
Sign in to rate
10,842 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (126)   Options

Loading...
50ccHonda (6 months ago)
Comment removed by author
50ccHonda (6 months ago)
Comment removed by author
50ccHonda (6 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
First off Cottonman, you live in Cotton. Your 60 years old watching YouTube. Second off, the issue here was the smoking ban, he was against it because his people voted against it, and if his people voted for it then he would vote for it. I know with your education thats hard to understand but what he is trying to say is that he represents his people. If your soo much better then run against him, I dare you.
50ccHonda (6 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
He is not the the one who brought it up, another commissioner asked him... If the issue were slavery, and if his constituents voted for it then would he represent themjob. He said he would because that is his JOB, his job is to represent his people.
Blacklab3093 (8 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Constitutionally limited democratic-republic is my understanding. It is referred to as a democracy loosely because the citizens elect their representatives (if you can pretend the electoral college doesn't exist ). In a true democracy every citizen would vote on every piece of legislation.
Blacklab3093 (8 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
His hypocrisy knows no bounds apparently. I can hardly think of a better example of authoritarianism than trying to ban private citizens from recording public meetings- his latest endeavor. When said ban violates the Minnesota Open Meeting law as well as state and federal constitutional free speech rights I would have to lean toward calling that imposing his will upon the people.

I suppose when one makes a fool of himself in public meetings having it posted on YouTube can be quite humiliating.
Blacklab3093 (8 months ago)
Comment removed by author
Blacklab3093 (8 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
He is correct that he is supposed to represent his constituents. I don't want a leader I want a representative, however, if such a request was made by the majority it would be the moral code of a respectable human being to either refuse to vote or resign in that situation. Mr Nelson either lacks that code or is such an epic buffoon that he would say anything to win an argument and save face. Let us hope it is the latter. Either way he is an embarrassment to my community and unfit for office.
mnswanmaiden (9 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Nelson was indeed wrong, but not the brightest penny in the pocket it's not an uncommon phenomenon.

Constitution-based federal republic; strong democratic tradition

Cia Fact Book United States Government

Federal Constitutional Republic

Wikipedia United States
unklscrufy (9 months ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
You might consider him your leader, but he was elected to represent his constituents.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.