Mic Check: Microphone Shootout Audix OM2 vs Shure SM58

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,630
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 19, 2010

Lets see who will win this shootout between the legendary Shure SM58 and the Audix OM2.

For these mics and tons of other pro audio gear visit proaudiostar.com, they'll hook you up!

Go to proaudiostar.com and enter the discount code WORKINGMANOM2 to receive a great deal on the Audix OM2.

Enter WORKINGMANSM58 to receive a great deal on the SHURE SM58!

http://www.proaudiostar.com/

Audix OM2
http://www.proaudiostar.com/audix-om2-all-purpose-mic.html

SHURE SM58
http://www.proaudiostar.com/catalogse...

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (WorkingManStudios)

  • this is great dude. thank you

  • @InHouseMaterial: your welcome!

  • i like this review. good work! but i want to add something.

    without pop-filter, om2 definitely has more output, also good feedback agains the sm58. i test both of them in studio and live. otherwise, there are both good mic.

  • @darkdark123: Yep the OM2 is better with a pop filter and i like it on guitar

  • Another great review. I might add that plosives are not necessarily a bad thing. One thing good about Condensor mics is just that. The ability to pickup breathy sounds when recording.

  • @wildhorsestudios1421: Thank you! I watched your videos for references. I OM2 is a sensitive mic and I like it for voice overs and guitar. Great mic!

Video Responses

This video is a response to Mic Check: Mic Shootout AKG D5 vs Shure SM58
see all

All Comments (33)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Great comparison! As a singer, I find that the SM58 smooths out subtle inconsistencies in my voice, and even mitigates fatigue issues. The OM2 is a little more sensitive and tends to bring out these issues. I move around the mic as I look to other band members and my voice drops out with the hypercardioid OM2, but remains strong with the SM58 from any angle. For very technical singers w/ great control the scale might tip toward the OM2, but for good singers like me the SM58 wins.

  • I have SM58, it's great on home studio, by this video it seems that OM2 has to be used very close to the vocalist, but it raises the plosive sounds. I think I remain with my 58. For live situations, the same...

  • @CaioIzel Yeh thats why in 99 out of 100 live clips you'll see an SM58...Ive been doing this for a living for 30+ years and the 58 has always been the most accepted and versatile mic out there...come back in 5 years and see how the Audix is going....how many times have I seen the new mic thats "better" than a 58 sink like a stone 6 months later and anyone who bought one left with a doorstop...eg AT41m, Sennheiser 419 Beyer M88....yawn is all I say evertime I hear the "better than a 58"

  • how about a review on the lampifier mics cant find one anywhere be the first

  • Nice headphones.

  • This is a really well-presented video, thanks. I went for an OM2 myself, it's great because I have a fairly noisy desktop PC and I don't want the mic picking that up. The pattern, like you said, cuts all that out.

  • Maybe you, or someone else, should consider doing these kind of comparison shoot-outs with condenser microphones too?

  • The quieter Audix sounds clearer, but if you back off the 58 a little til you're at the same volume as the Audix it will sound just as clear.

  • Thank You! I Go For SHURE SM58...

  • Thank I Go For SHURE SM58...

    

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more