Peter Dow's website - http://scot.tk
For Freedom Forums - http://figh.tk
Royalist "Sir" Colin Powell - "... showed America there is nothing a black person cannot do" said the traitor Powell.
American TV network news last night reported President Bush awarding The Congressional Gold Medal to the Tuskegee Airmen, and not before time.
Now THAT'S a medal worth having!
So a good news story? Yes, but here is the grit in that oyster - speaking and correctly praising the black airmen along with the President was Colin Powell - a former general and Condoleezza Rice's predecessor as Secretary of State.
So where's the grit?
Powell has shown Americans that a black person like himself can be a traitor to the United States of America by assisting the enemy royalist-terrorist axis in the war in terror when he gave his treacherous support to the UK monarchy by accepting an honorary knighthood from Queen Elizabeth.
(The royalist-terrorist axis explanation wrote:
The incompetence and injustice of royalist rule in countries throughout the world, from the UK to Saudi Arabia, has a long history of provoking many terrorist outrages that would not have been provoked had good democratic republican rule replaced the royalist rule. So monarchies give rise to terrorism and this evil royalist-terrorist axis leads to all kinds of out-rages, like 9/11 which was carried out by mostly Saudi terrorists.)
In so doing, Powell was in effect telling black and white Britons (whose name isn't Windsor) that there IS something they cannot yet do - become head of state of Britain - because that position is reserved for the monarchy, this side of a republican revolution in Britain, a republican revolution which Powell has set himself against.
Well it is just as well that nowadays Condi has got better republicans than Colin Powell to watch her back. Better republicans who cannot be impressed with Colin Powell accepting an honorary knighthood from Queen Elizabeth and better republicans who are planning that Condi shall not make the same mistake.
A story goes that Condi had the good sense to ask that the oil tanker which was once named after her, should be re-named so as not to equate her name too closely with the "war about oil" accusations we sometimes hear.
The oil-tanker "Condoleezza Rice" was a honour which Condi returned, with all the grace you'd expect from a once competitive ice-skater.
To win the war on terror, entirely and convincingly, we are going to have to neutralise all the harm being done to international politics by the royalists and the terrorism royalist rule seems to provoke and that means getting a U.S. President of the most exceptional leadership ability.
That means we need a president with more insight than Eisenhower and Reagan - both only too keen to accept a honorary knighthood from the UK without thought to the long term harm to good republican government and peace in the world.
It means a president better than Colin Powell, who was considering a run for the presidency at one point. Colin Powell would have been as much a President as Eisenhower or Reagan, no question, but their slow-burning treason against the republic of U.S.A. is no longer tolerable when there is a war on terrorism to win.
It means a presidency of someone with the exceptional ability of Condoleezza Rice who would have the intelligence to see the down-side of an honorary knighthood and who would be smart enough to decline or return any such so-called "honour".
So there is one just person I know of who can guarantee a win in the war on terror - that would be a President Condoleezza Rice.
If Powell wishes to redeem himself in the eyes of republicans all he has to do is to return the honorary knighthood to the Queen, and let the world know that he has had second thoughts about accepting the knighthood.
Discuss this video on the For Freedom Forums
Topic -"Sir" Colin Powell - black traitor to the U.S.A.
Poll - Should Colin Powell reject and return his honorary knighthood to the Queen?
http://scot.tk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=201
Attention Americans! Who are your true friends? Not the Windsors!
http://scot.tk/objection.htm
Discuss this or other videos on the For Freedom Forums
http://scot.tk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=193
90+ more videos by Peter Dow here -
http://uk.youtube.com/groups_videos?name=peterdowtv
Oh please, it's an honourary knighthood. Ronald Reagan got one, too. Was he a "Royalist Traitor"?
acerlutra 3 years ago
acerlutra - Please read this video's (More info).
"Colin Powell would have been as much a President as Eisenhower or Reagan, no question, but their slow-burning treason against the republic of U.S.A. is no longer tolerable when there is a war on terrorism to win."
So my answer to your question is "Yes, Reagan WAS a royalist traitor."
Why do you think the world is in such a mess? Republicans have been betrayed from the very top.
ProAmericanBriton 3 years ago
@ProAmericanBriton betrayed by WHOM? war on terror or terrorism is simply a scheme to enrich arms sellers. see 60 minutes segment on "the narrative"
RAlexan722 1 year ago
@RAlexan722 No that's not quite right. It is closer to the truth to say that the war on terror is compromised and deflected away from targeting the financiers of Al Qaeda - the oil rich Arab kingdoms and dictatorships - because said Arab rulers are also pampered customers of western companies, though the satellite TV stations they buy are more functional for inciting terrorism by proxies. The Arab kingdoms haven't used the arms they buy off us against us, yet.
ProAmericanBriton 1 year ago