Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Past & Future Climate change - Pt 1of 4

The first of a 4 part presentation where Scientist David Archibald has researched the data that effects Climate change and has worked out the most likely future climate predictions. Inconvenient T...  
 
Customize

More From: Bushvision

Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause? - Pt 1 of 49:41
265,325 views
Past & Future Climate Change - Pt 2 of 48:53
5,334 views
Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause?-  pt 4 of 49:35
76,978 views
Evidence CO2 does not cause dangerous Global warming1:50
14,548 views
David Evans - Why CO2 cannot be blamed for Global warming8:43
15,257 views
Climate Change - Bob Carters 5 Tests of CO2 part 19:44
17,575 views
35 Inconvenient Truths part 19:48
11,196 views
Science & social aspects of climate change pt 19:24
4,275 views
Past & Future Climate change pt 3 of 49:35
4,425 views
Apocalypse? No! - Why there is no Global Warming Crisis9:43
25,752 views
Global Warming Fish & Sunspots  Part 19:08
1,494 views
climatology, ocean circulation & climate change8:35
1,144 views
he case against dangerous global warming pt 1T9:00
1,540 views
Why The IPCC models are wrong pt 28:53
3,063 views
Bob Carter Science & Social aspects of climate change pt49:37
2,037 views
The case against global warming Pt 49:23
904 views
Cropping that Saves the Soil3:29
2,098 views
President Vaclav Klaus - Climate change & freedom9:18
5,747 views
The Media & the global warming Hype - John Stossell9:41
8,682 views
Science & social aspects of climate change pt 29:29
2,450 views

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

This is a video response to Global Warming: junk science vs. real science
64 ratings
Sign in to rate
17,260 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (153)   Options

Loading...
cristop5 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
1. By his own admission he SELECTS temperature records from particular places, places that do not reflect the global pattern. All very interesting, but you cannot extrapolate from atypical places! Anyway there is no need when you have global averages to work with.
2. Why on earth does he use a graph from 1990 when more up to date ones are available? Strangely enough much has been learnt since 1990, and the MWP was a regional not global phenomenon.
ClydeCoulter (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
No, DuesExMachina, the burden of proof lies with everyone that is trying to prove anything.
It has already been shown that Co2 levels follow temperature levels. Why? Because plants release Co2 and breed better in warmer temperatures.
Yes, we give off Co2, breath in oxy, breath out Co2, plants take that Co2 and exhaust Oxy. Cool, it's a cooperative planet.
DeusExMachina7709 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The graph at 4:41 is hilarious. I love how it stops in 1970, before the current global warming trend in question began!
yostiyosti (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Yes! You are right. And it's after 1300, when temperatures were about as high. And 150.000 years ago, temperatures were also that high. Those Neandertals really screwed up this planet. Bastards!
DeusExMachina7709 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
About as high? The MWP was several tenths of a degree colder than current temperatures. And both the MWP and the Holocene warming can be explained through natural means.
yostiyosti (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Thanks for your answer. And this (the current) period cannot be explained by natural means? My point is, that there's still no conclusive evidence that there is a causal connection between co2 levels and the -assumed- rise of temperature.
DeusExMachina7709 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
It can only be explained by CO2. No other climate variable can explain it. If skeptics see otherwise, the burden of proof lies with them.
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
crazy7house (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Climate Change=Hoax! No such thing, temps have fluctuated from cool to warm, warm to cool, we are actually cooling truth be told!
DeusExMachina7709 (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Temperatures always fluctuate for a reason. Temperatures could go up or down based on solar variation, volcanic activity, sulfur emissions, ENSO, PDO, etc.

The problem is, the 'natural' variables like solar activity indicate we should be experiencing global cooling, but we've actually experience .5 C of warming. The only explanation is man-made CO2.

By your logic, any degree of warming or cooling is perfectly A-OK. Of course, that's not true.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.