Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Past & Future Climate change - Pt 1of 4

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
21,847
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 13, 2007

The first of a 4 part presentation where Scientist David Archibald has researched the data that effects Climate change and has worked out the
most likely future climate predictions.
Inconvenient Truth Author Al Gore would find his views contradicted by this presentation

  • likes, 17 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @cristop5 "Anyone who looks at the data will see a rising trend since the 1970s."

    that is right until 1998 it's normal just like the rising trend until about 1880 then temps went down until 1915 then temps went up until 1940 then down until about 1975 then up until 1998 when it's about time to start going down. All superimposed on recovery from a Bond event. Why you are having so much difficulty recognising cyclic behaviour is a mystery. Of course if your job depended on .....

  • @cristop5 but your claim that it has cooled since 1998 is obviously not supported by any of the three data sources we have looked at"

    actually it is whether it has warmed or cooled depends on how much energy is in the system using UAH anomalies the average of the peak 3 months 1998 El Nino is .683 (T1) and for three peak months 2010 is .637 (T2) now change in heat in the system is given by Q = C(T2 -T1) since the earths heat capacity is not changing since T1 > T2 it will be negative.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Global Warming: junk science vs. real science
see all

All Comments (482)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • pleasure to know this video, thank u

  • @OvoidCranium These dirty and filthy rich industry. Climate change is not the biggest issue here in general (though it may be in your perspective because that is what the title of this video is) your argument and efforts could be in better areas is what I mean. The biggest issue is our efficiency and transitioning outdated technology so we can decrease the thirst and rely on something more dependable, abundant, efficient, faster and easier to transfer, electricity.

  • @OvoidCranium And all this info is in aim to? Refute the whole anthropogenic climate change theory. This is excellent for oil companies, to progress forward and increase demand like it is out of style.. What happens when there's so much thirst and all of a sudden there's a war, and pipelines are cut off? What happens if other events like a natural disaster, cuts off our supply? Better to think about that thirst. Also better to think about efficiency and majorly taxing these dirty

  • really funny how the data shown should reflect urban temperatures from mid-latitudes while the sea-ice, glaciers, in the High-Arctic, (one of the region not influenced by urban temperatures) show all unprecedented melting since 1970-2012.

  • @bannor99: I didn't know that IPCC, w/ its fake report fraudulently claiming to represent 1,000s of scientists when only a handful of scientists were involved in it & many of them asked to have their names removed, was an American "right-wing" endeavor. I didn't know those ENGLISH "scientists" caught w/ their tricky emails exposed were actually right wing Americans. All the demonstrable frauds are FOR AGW. Guess that's why you can't defend the "science."

  • @VictorLepanto If you don't believe that it's about "Us vs Them", you have a very funny way of showing it. Just because you haven't heard of someone doesn't mean they're irrelevant but it just might ( along with your willingness to dismiss them out of hand) mean you're ignorant.

    I would thank you for revealing, once again, the true lack of honesty and rectitude of the American right wing but it would only underscore just how far the world's (former) superpower has fallen

  • @bannor99: How pathetic. Life isn't about "us vs. them," or left vs. right, or Republicans vs. Democrats. I can't even imagine what some filthy little political goober I've never heard of, & now would never want to know about, is supposed to prove regarding anything that matters in this world.

    I do thank you for demonstrating how "green" politics is really watermelon politics. AGW is the biggest pseudoscientific fraud since Lysenko. That has all been driven by this U.N. IPCC.

  • @VictorLepanto Of course, you also read the part about this being originally proposed by a

    senior Republican, yes?

  • @bannor99: Ah, the propagandists LOOOOOOOVE of euphemisms! "VOLUNTARY!" You can call a gang of government goons trying to talking some poor sick (possibly even terminally) person into just giving up & dying. Someone sick w/ cancer, or facing years of physical impairment, who already is deeply depressed, being pressured to just give up. You can call these pigs w/ their Hobson's choice (or should I say Sophie's choice) what you want. You know as well as I do what they really are.

  • @VictorLepanto The VOLUNTARY end-of-life counseling was 1st proposed by a fella named Johnny Isakson, who for over 35 years, has served as 1) a State Senator 2) member of the House 3) gubernatorial candidate 4) House Minority Leader 5) US Senator.

    Here's your simple fill in the blank quiz : Senator John Hardy Isakson has, for his entire political career, been a member of the __________ Party.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more