Noam Chomsky On Gaza - 2009.01.13 - MIT (4 of 11)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,603
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • i love his style of speaking, humble yet articulate and always factual. you can't go wrong with clear cut unchanging facts

  • I LOVE HOW HE ALWAYS SAYS: U.S. / ISRAELI ATTACK ON PALESTINE/ GAZA.

    so true.

see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • here is a stupid question does the west bank or gaza have an Airport?

    Why should Israel have the only airport and furthuer more I am sick and tired of hearing about Israel , lets build a wll around them and let them all rot in there.

  • Chomsky is ABSOLUTELY wrong !!!

    at least on political subjects.

    Perhaps he is a complete idiot.

    Am ISRAEL Chai Vekayam !

  • is the state of israel legitimate or legal under international law and UN charter. are the askanazim indeginous to the region. are the palistinians indeginous to the region and would a one state PALESTINE be legal under international law and UN charter?

  • Chomsky on how Hamas policies are more conducive to peace than the U.S.'s or Isreal's

    /watch?v=vD8Eghw1Bik&feature=r­elated

  • Hamas offered a long peace treaty spaniing for about 100 years from today in exchage for the withrawal from occupied lands...but strongly rejected any recognition of israel...I see that fair.

  • yes but hamas never opposed it as well

    hamas response to these talks was " we don not oppose the depolomatic efforts that are carried out by the other frcation-Fatah- although there is no clear guarantee that israel will return back the west bank to Fatah...Hamas strongly opposed a recongnition of israel as a basis for any withdrawal from the occupied lands...instead Hamas said "Israel must withdraw first, and then the issue if the pals would recongnize israel is left to future generations"

  • Chomsky is marginalized because dissent is not allowed. I commented on Chomsky's being loose with facts (Someone responded that he was being sarcastic and his subsequent laugh proved it.) I thought afterwards, "The man is using rhetoric; he's exaggerating or even mis-stating to make a larger point that's true." (Hamas never accepted a 2 state solution) But my polite dissent is voted out by you who do not allow dissent. "Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss."

  • free speech in action. good.

    i don't like the israeli settlements in the west bank. No Sir, not one bit.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more