WE LANDED ON THE MOON #1 Moonrocks

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,853
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 18, 2007

This is the first in a series of videos explaining the basic evidence that proves we landed on the moon in 1969 and thereafter. Movie #1 explains the Moonrocks, how their authenticity has never been questioned.

As a Science Teacher at heart, I was personally disgusted at the ridiculous preponderance of "APOLLO WAS A HOAX" websites proported by those who are the most ill-informed and conspiracy minded of our society. Certain science teachers have complained to NASA that this hysteria has gone on long enough, and I happen to agree. This is my response.

Here are the positive and proactive pieces of evidence that the hoax believers always try to avoid like the plague. These are definitive areas of examination that are tangible, touchable, and open for scientific debate. The hoax believers might be really proud of their lost shadows, wrong reflections, and scrubbed sand; but now, here is the evidence that is up to them to DISPROVE, the evidence they coincidentally forget to mention on nearly every webpage or TV special I have come across, and we have to wonder why.

I originally aimed these movies at a high school audience, students untainted by the paranoid minutia of the hoax believers, students who are simply looking to find the truth for themselves in a sea of misinformation. As such I do not address every nickel and dime screwball argument, as they are exactly that: screwball arguments enacted only by the dimwitted who have only the most superficial science background whose main arguing tactic is merely to read someone else's webpage and parrot it verbatim. Hearing a big word on TV and then repeating it in an effort to sound smart is not debating, its begging for attention.
These videos on the other hand, deal in facts only.

I originally made these 4 years ago as a project for my Educational Technology graduate course. As such they are a little rougher around the edges than my more recent productions, which is why I posted them under this name rather than my real name SpreadingTheMuse. Look under that name to find my current productions such as Mathematics videos. If the demand is good enough, I can produce more videos debunking virtually any topic that can be brought up.

Conspiracy lunatics, you really arent welcome here, and I will delete any post where it is obvious that you are just repeating big words you read somewhere else. These movies are for students, and they have little if anything to learn from you.

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 18 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (SpeakerForBoskone)

  • If people in white lab coats tell you something, it must be true. If Russians in white lab coats tell you the same thing, it must be even more true. The moon landings were a clever hoax- the man wiring the LEM had no reason to suspect that it was a prop and not a machine. The Apollo 11 press footage is a beautiful document. Freshly threatened with their lives, the faces show it all- imagine the fop-sweat of their handlers-the entire rotting shed of new age Bolshevism could have been torched.

  • @hozayamz DISbelieving the white coat, just because its a white coat, isnt intelligence. Its rank paranoia. The White coats are at least as believable as the fear-mongering conspiraholics who cut and paste "hoax" talking points no questions asked from whatever dumb webpage they stumble across.

    Worse, "threatened with lives" is the invention of ANOTHER fear-mongering conspiracy. Using one conspiracy as proof of another conspiracy only proves how stupid the evidence is for either one.

Top Comments

  • The hoax is dead Cosmo, give it up. The landings on the moon were reality.

  • @stewielips

    We're going to believe NASA before we believe scientifically illiterate hoax gluttons begging for attention with retarded hoaxes.

    You didnt know the moonrocks were given away to 12 international museums?

    You didnt know they were given away to 150 foreign countries? How much of an "INDEPENDENT" source are you even educated enough to know about? Since you didnt know the moonrocks were already independently confirmed, you're likely ignorant on everything else as well.

see all

All Comments (949)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @hozayamz "cold war was fake" You cant invent ANOTHER dumb conspiracy as proof of your first dumb conspiracy. Thats just making up your story as you go.

  • @hozayamz If the russian probes were not capable, I'd prefer to hear that from an actual engineer who knew what he was talking about, not a youtard newb taking a wild flying guess.

    And moonrocks on Earth? Moonrocks ruined by wind and water erosion? Oxidized and rusted by an oxygen atmosphere? Which could never happen on an airless moon? Do you really think any such rock would fool any geologist over the age of 4? You didnt think it out.

  • Oh shut the fuck up. How bout we send brain-dead pseudo-intellectuals like yourself to the moon?

  • @Chazwozel1  Nonsense. The cold war was a mutually beneficial arrangement for the governments & parasitic industries of both sides. Each faked missions. If you think the Russians could successfully return material from the moon in the 1970's, you've been fooled by a crude heap of junk welded together by drunk pipe-fitters. There are plenty of moon rocks to be found on earth, obviously. He who pays the piper calls the tune, he who signs the paycheck makes the rules.

  • @sssssjjjj1 Good to know you have absolutely no handle on how physics works. The Space Shuttle doesn't pack enough fuel to travel to the moon. Look up rocket staging and basic concepts of thrust and friction before being a total internet turd.

    Cities? Ha! Can you tell me how to transport enough compressed air to sustain a city on the moon? Do you have any idea what an engineering feat that would be? Are you 11 years old?

  • @hozayamz The Russian white coats would do everything in their fucking power to disprove that the moon rocks were from the moon in order to make the U.S. space program look like it failed. The evidence has been all heavily scrutinized by many governments and consistently proven that, yes, the U.S. went to the moon.

  • @sssssjjjj1 Who proved them fake? You believe the shuttle is a vehicle that could go and land on the moon? It's

  • The Soviets actually only got .7 lbs. and it took them 3 missions to get that much (Luna 16, 20 & 23). That means for NASA to have 840 lbs. from unmanned missions, using known technology, they would have had to take over 3,600 trips! Most hoax theorists (with half a brain) would choose to believe NASA doesn't have 840 lbs., since they haven't seen it with their own eyes (as if they'd know a moon rock from a Snickers Bar). That's why geologists from around the world verified MANY samples.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more