Kent Hovind gets owned on his radio show!Part 2 of 3

Kent is a retard.....

produced by EGarrett01

http://youtube.com/user/EGarrett01

This video was pulled on 9/10/07 due to a fraudulent DMCA claim by the evil CSE! NOW IT HAS RETURNED! Fuck Kent Hovind and the CSE!

part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83NLkGZHTSw

part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXgl4AUZnrg


This is martins blog
http://lancelet.blogspot.com/

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• creation
• science
• evangelism
• kent
• hovind
• liar
• fraud
• thief
• tax
• evasion
• rabidape
• banned
• get
• a
• grip
• creationist
• nonsense

[Scoundrelus]

That caller really knows his stuff.

[Casshyr]

It is time we demand evidence for God before even thinking about using God to explain anything in natural science. Science has no association with supernatural, so if you creationist want to introduce concept of God as an alternative explanation, you need to first prove God's existence SCIENTIFICALLY

[Casshyr]

@Midnite4Life777 "I thought science was based on FACT(S)? " => yes, science makes PREDICTIONS based on facts. For the case of evolution theory, the prediction is ideas like common descent, and the facts are as stated by evolution itself (i.e. things that you would otherwise categorize as micro-evolution). Creationists fail in their argument in the sense they use God to explain away things yet they haven't even proof the existence of their God scientifically yet. Can't do that!

[Casshyr]

@Midnite4Life777 "science has to believe in something you cant see" => when it comes to studying the past, there will always be a bit of "faith" involved. But that doesn't mean it's on the same level as religion. There is a difference between believing in a supernatural vs believing in a non-supernatural interpretation of the evidence. Human cultures have constantly try to use supernatural to explain away things, and NONE are ever correct.

[floppel]

2:10 is really the core of the whole argument, too bad the audio cuts off at that point. Suppose you had a random distribution of characteristics, then it would be impossible to organize them in a nested hierarchy. But if you have millions of entities and you find that there's a way to classify them in a tree structure, then that is a stunning discovery. If there was a designer, why would he constrain himself in such a strict manner? Intelligent design just raises more questions than it answers.

[Midnite4Life777]

Am i really the only guy who listened to this kid talk to the Dr. Hovind guy? He kept changing his story and then actually agreed that science has to believe in something you cant see (at 4:38 sec). I thought science was based on FACT(S)? I gota give credit to da Dr. guy for not start laughing or cutting him off the way he got cut off! He's a very patient man when it comes to "Debaters" that come on the show with no proof or refrences on proof of which we can obtain to review! Dr.guy WINS debate

[TheThunderduck]

@Casshyr The argument from Creationists is, if you cannot explain every single thing we bring up....to infinity, then evolution and biogenesis can't be proven therefore, GOD DID IT ! Now shut up, get on your knees and worship OUR God.

[charliewheeler21]

I think me along with every viewer here would follow martin on an evolutionary quest for rightousness.

[gianboy2001]

@randallfe Sure you are.... =) it runs in your family....

[randallfe]

@gianboy2001 you fucking idiot