C-1輸送機の着艦(エアロダンシング4）

できるという噂を聞いていたのでやったらできました。燃料を投棄するのがポイントみたいです。

実物のC-130輸送機でも着艦できるみたいです。次のURLの動画で実際の着艦が見れます。

http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=BjNyQvhsQE8

この動画を撮る前に不思議な失敗をしてしまいました。その時の様子は次のURLの動画で見られます。

http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJpA3kkz_RI

追記
YouTubeで動画を見ていたら、C-1や他の機体で着艦している動画が既にありました。以下のURLの動画です。様々な機体を使って非常に華麗な着艦をしています。

http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=cGJzz1yU9os

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• ゲーム
• エアロダンシング4
• 着艦
• C-1
• 輸送機

[allgoo19]

Pretty amazing. It may not take too long before Japan takes a lead in military aviation.

No wonder US didn't want to allow them to design and produce their own for a long time since the end of WWII.

[sirokuroame]

Thanks for your comment. The new Japanese transport aircraft Kawasaki XC-2 is tested now and is going to replace C-1 in this video.

[ptitaiglon]

nice plane but can it land on a carrier? :o

[sirokuroame]

This Japanese transport aircraft Kawasaki C-1 isn't designed to land on a carrier. If it tried, it could land successfully.

[nocturne1105]

ハッチを開けたまま着艦もできますよ♪

[sirokuroame]

山頂に荷物を配達するミッションでハッチを開けて以来、

使わずにいたので存在を忘れていました。

ハッチを開けたままだと操縦が難しくなったりするんでしょうか？­

[nocturne1105]

@AmericanAviator

localizations?

There was not the technology with main wing and body 1 as structure in then U.S.A.

[allgoo19]

@UprisingOfTheMolemen

"Oh look a wapanese faggot talking out of his ass. Why am I not surprised?.."

And what is your point?

Are you here to show off how stupid you are? ^_^

[allgoo19]

@AmericanAviator

"I've been expressing my point.."

Really?

Repeat it if you think I missed it.

There are only 5 comments made by you before this. I read them all and I couldn't find it.

[AmericanAviator]

@allgoo19 And since you want to pick out profile quips

"Hometown:

Konoha village"

lol.

"Schools:

Ninja academy, group seven"

I'm sure your job opportunities are through the roof. Must look good on a resume.

And really? Naruto? There's way better stuff out there, you sad rittle ronery man.

[AmericanAviator]

@allgoo19 I can fly more than a Cessna, fyi. Even if I wasn't endorsed for high performance and complex, It's still more than you.

I've been expressing my point, you're just refusing to read it. All you can do is set up strawmen. It's like you're a Creationist. I commented on the nature of superior transport craft to the Kawasaki C-1 and mention two craft that do a better job. And, that made you butthurt.

So, run along back to your animus, wapanese. 

[allgoo19]

@AmericanAviator

"Soon-to-be pilot"

Oh I get it! This is your point. You just wanted to brag about it? "I'm a pilot, I can fly a cesna!!"? ^_^

Be honest, what was your point? " Is it like, "Japanese wil NEVER design and build a better airplane than US companies do"?

I haven't heard a word of truth. Where is it?

[allgoo19]

@AmericanAviator

"You project awful hard. .."

And what your point if not "America is the only country produce the best of everything."?

Please answer.

[AmericanAviator]

@allgoo19 You project awful hard. Really hard. I never once said anything about the US. You also glanced over where I cited European and Chinese as well. This leads me to believe you're a text book weeaboo. I could also bring up the Sukhoi and RSK plants. And of course you have to compare it to another model, otherwise you haven't any frame of reference. Or is this a concept you can't grasp? If you're going to make a statement about a subject you don't understand, be prepared, weeaboo.

[allgoo19]

@AmericanAviator

"Yeah, the future that's .."

This makes any point at all.

And what your point if not "America is the only country produce the best of everything."? And that Japanese will NEVER produce anything superior to American made products?

Please make your point briefly.

About Zero, I was trying to show the ability to make better products, not comparing one model to another. You seem to have difficulty understanding?