Answers (Part One) - Sixty Symbols

We answer viewer questions about string theory, gravity, magnetism and the speed of light - and more. See more videos at http://www.sixtysymbols.com/

Follow us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/periodicvideos

Or on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Sixty-Symbols-Fan-Page/10150109085555564

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• magnetism
• string
• theory
• gravity

[1KevinsFamousChili1]

Astrology is soooo dumb!

[umbracus]

2:43 Insane clown posse asks a question (it's been paraphrased of course)

[raydredX]

10:45 Power balance's Quantum Hologram's... Dunno how they got so far.

[kmiki007]

Thanks for this video (and for the others). Regarding the question that what annoys you perhaps it is not surprising that me, a biologist, annoy the same things (plus creationism, intelligent design, etc.).

[watermelonygoodness]

@mrrobotica Make your argument or don't make your argument. This is asinine.

[mrrobotica]

@watermelonygoodness The point of asking those questions is to see what you accept and know. Do I really have to explain to you that Kant's philosophy was anti-reason? Do I have to explain to you how influential Kant's philosophy is and was? Both are easy to explain but hopefully, at least one wouldn't be necessary. When trying to convince someone of something it's good to know what they know and accept in order not to waste your time.

[watermelonygoodness]

@mrrobotica You are saying that Kant closed the door to reason. I am asking you to explain your case. That's how it works. You state your position, and then you provide evidence, you explain it, you back it up. You can't just state your position and expect that to mean anything. It doesn't. You said Kant closed the door to reason. I am asking you for your evidence of this, your reason, your argument.

[mrrobotica]

@watermelonygoodness Are you suggesting that Kant was not anti-reason, that he was not influential or both?

[watermelonygoodness]

@mrrobotica This is wrong on so many levels I don't even know how to respond. I guess I'll start here: How did Kant close the door of philosophy to reason?

[mrrobotica]

@watermelonygoodness He was the man who closed the door of philosophy to reason. He did not succeed at proving that reason is invalid but he did succeed in convincing the majority of intellectuals and philosophers, setting the world on a paradigm shift away from reason and towards mysticism and subjectivism. The first movement which pluralized Kant's philosophy was Marxism. Following Marxism came Nazism, which simply replaced class with race.

[watermelonygoodness]

@mrrobotica Why

[Dalfon2000]

Great Series of videos thanks for making the web better