12/02/07 Overhazard vs. WhiteKhakis (SecondBilling? SoWhat!)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,880
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 2, 2007

Been awhile, eh? How about checking out a "Best out of Three" with Overhazard and me?

*SPOILERS* follow
(Commentary after lineup)

**************************************** ****



EEL
----------------------------------
Kangaskhan
Spiritomb
Huntail

VS

Cyndy
---------------------------------
Manectric
???
???

(I know the opening statement should read "and I", but that doesn't sound as catchy!)

What a way to start! You all know I love Focus Sashes, right? It's my fault for not having much in the way of countering it, honestly.

I switched out Kangaskhan, because she IS fairly fast, and I know that he can OHKO some of those other Pokemon I saw Overhazard had.

And why'd I use Confuse Ray? (Not that it hit - lucky me, huh?) Well, I wanted to test my luck to be honest. Everything was really going downhill, and I just wanted to see if I could win a simple coin toss - I think my being Fully Paralyzed answered my question more than I cared it to!

Oh, and Kangaskhan used Focus Punch because she was a goner. So why not use a move, that in the off-chance Overhazard switches (to a rock to counter Return, let's say) might KO the new Pokemon?

Huntail didn't have a chance.

(Check the video response for the second match!)

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (WhiteKhakis)

  • That was a horribly unlucky battle for you. If Spiritomb got a move off (ANY MOVE), you might have had a chance.

    Kinda unbelievable you fell to nothing but Thunderbolt. Oh well, that's part of the game.

  • I probably slipped up somewhere along the way, too. We all have losses like this - I remember one of the fights involved a clean sweep against Ohazard, too!

  • "(I know the opening statement should read 'and I', but that doesn't sound as catchy!)"

    Actually, "with Overhazard and me" is the correct grammar. :D

  • Yeah, it sounds right as "with me and Overhazard", therefore the switching of subjects shouldn't matter.

    Overhazard is a professed grammar adept, so I needed to cover my bases to avoid any possible repercussions, see?

  • wat does it mean -.- please answer! grawr

  • Look up "legitimate". That should answer your question.

see all

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • No no, you're opening statement is grammatically correct, no worries :)

  • this time, your team sucked.

  • lol at unagi :P

  • no it isnt, lol!

  • Hah, yeah. But I've been told that I'm quite the spelling and grammar savant myself. XD

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more