Reponse to Telemantros (Part 2/4)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
74 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Aug 22, 2009

Luigi and Mario make a four part video response to Telemantros.

Telemantros' video...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxffqY...

Original video being discussed...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqFQWX...

Luigi: Sorry this took so long to finally upload. Also, if I come off a little rude, try not to take it personally. I was just not in a particularly good mood when I made this video.

Thanks for watching

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Was that last point about pyramids going to go onto say that, if all the evidence for pyramids eroded into dust, a rational person would believe that the pyramids did not exist? That is to say, even if Jesus DID resurrect, there are such small levels of evidence that it would still be irrational to believe he resurrected, without further evidence. Even if he did resurrect, how can we jump to him being the only one to do this, or the son of (the jewish) God rather than of the devil or a wizard?

  • The 'eyewitnesses' provide ordinary at best evidence for an extra-ordinary claim; if we do not know Resurrection is possible now, how can it be 2000 years ago? Resurrection requires the witness to evidence it, but Resurrection must be true for the witnesses to be reliable. Bible Jesus performed extraordinary deeds which some impartial witnesses should have recorded.

    If jesus empty tomb means he resurrected, Egyptian Pharaohs who were grave robbed did the zombie mambo too.

  • You don't need to know Hebrew history to see that the Apostles didn't agree with each other, contradicted themselves, were clearly based off one another, and of course made shit up regarding prophecies (well made prophecies that applied to specific individuals and were already fulfilled to jesus).

  • My mistake John didn't change the location. The location was the same in every gospel but Mathew.

    John changes the time in which Jesus dies.

  • That picture of French Military Victories was hilarious.

  • Anyone who knows the history of the gospels would know they aren't reliable testimony.

    Matthew for instance repeatedly takes Hebrew scripture out of context to convince the reader that Jesus fulfilled prophecy and John changes the location of where the apostles meet Jesus (an eyewitness wouldn't forget something like that).

    In Marks resurrection account nobody even encounters Jesus. The women just find the tomb empty and runaway.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more