WTC7 - The Firefighters KNEW!!

CLICK BELOW TO SEE VIDEO 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvF_KOrRUyE

PLEASE READ BELOW:
This is Part 2 of a series on the claims Zeitgeist makes about WTC 7

I did hope this would fit into one video but it didnt, so please go watch video 1 of you havent yet.

CORRECTION:

+ The 911 Commission DID mention building 7, so David Ray Griffin is even more wrong than I made out in the video. They dont discuss why it collapsed but as discussed in the video they didnt need to as they werent an engineering study and FEMA wrote a preliminary report on it 7 months prior and NIST was conducting the next investigation.

COMING UP:
I will talk about topics such as comparisions to demolitions, collapse times, comparisions to other buildings and understanding why it collapsed

SOURCES:
Sources will be added via annotations with additional notes if necessary here when I get the time.

MUSIC:
Original music by me

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Zeitgeist
• Moving
• Forward
• the
• movie
• WTC7
• building
• PART
• Video
• of
• Critical
• Analysis
• part
• video
• truther
• truth
• 911
• debunked
• debunk
• refuted
• wtc7
• world
• trade
• centre
• conspiracy
• theory
• theories
• david
• ray
• griffin
• peter
• joseph
• alex
• jones
• conspiracies
• JREF
• Mark
• Roberts
• nwo
• new
• order
• criticism
• criticisms
• Steven
• Jones
• Richard
• Gage
• Jim
• Hoffman
• ae911
• ae911truth
• architects
• and
• engineers
• firefighters
• firemen
• lies
• debunkers
• movement
• venus
• project
• jacque
• fresco

[TheSkepticalIdealist]

@MrPurpose79

-

Yea, those firefighters just keep believing it was fire! How stupid of them! 

[TheSkepticalIdealist]

@sausagedogheaven

-

"I've looked at the picture and the Madrid Building did not collapse."-

-

The entire building didn't, but the STEEL floors COLLAPSED - THE CONCRETE DID NOT.. What was the WTC made from again?

-

"I've read the official report, "

-

Liar.

[warlord2080]

"Fire fighters and blacksmiths are paid off to discredit the 9/11 truth movement" 5:36 straw man argument Alex Jones just failed how to use fallacies. Well really the guy asked a question on do you believe that he didn't site any source on their website or anything and Alex Jones completely turned on it its not a straw man argument its a question to his position.

[TheSkepticalIdealist]

@sausagedogheaven

-

"You directed me to a fire that says there was no structural failure after a big fire."-

-

Uh, yes there was structural failure, the only thing left standing was the massive amounts of concrete. THE STEEL COLLAPSED. What was the WTC built from again? How much of it was concrete again? You claimed steel can't get that hot in fires to fail. The steel collapsed, the steel failed.

[sausagedogheaven]

@TheSkepticalIdealist You seem to be arguing with yourself. You've been proven wrong. You directed me to a fire that says there was no structural failure after a big fire. You clearly have a screw loose. You should make a movie, "Loose Screws". :)

You're clearly clutching at straws, trying to confuse the issue with unsubstantiated claims that don't match up. Nice try but everyone knows, buildings don't collapse into their own footprint because of fire. Proven. Thanks for the laughs. :)

[TheSkepticalIdealist]

@sausagedogheaven

-

But you claimed that the reason the WTC could not have collapsed is because fire can't weaken steel to the point of failiure. That is quite clearly nonsence. What was the WTC made from? Steel. Was in reinforced with concrete? No. Was One Merdian Plaza thought to be at risk of a pancake collapse 10 years before 911? YES. Was the Windsor tower reinforced with concrete with a concrete core and thats why it didn't collapse totally? YES. DID THE STEEL FAIL AND COLLAPSE? YES

[sausagedogheaven]

@TheSkepticalIdealist Thank you for proving my point yet again, that building did not collapse. The New York buildings collapsed. I said what everyone knows.....no building had ever collapsed into its own footprint. The Madrid building didn't collapse into its own footprint. Thank you once again for proving that you can't find a single building that collapsed into its own footprint. The Madrid building DID NOT COLLAPSE. A tiny percentage of the top collapsed but the BUILDING didn't collapse. :)

[TheSkepticalIdealist]

@sausagedogheaven

-

And here's a quote from the original structural engineer of the Windsor tower ... "Total progressive collapse was resisted by the massive transfer structure at the 17th floor level. Three sections of the upper floors collapsed in total, leaving the core and the tower crane used in the refurbishment still standing." .... "Blanco said his main lesson from the Madrid fire was to 'use bigger steel sections, and surround them in CONCRETE'."

[TheSkepticalIdealist]

@sausagedogheaven

-

Additionally, if you actually look at the damage caused to the Windsor tower, you can see it would have collapsed had it not been reinforced with concrete. Steel floors collapsed, columns bucked. Manchester Univercity QUOTE: "the reinforced concrete central core, columns, waffle slabs and transfer structures performed very well in such a severe fire .. the structural integrity and redundancy of the remaining parts of the building provided the overall stability"

[sausagedogheaven]

@TheSkepticalIdealist Haaaaaaa. you failed, just live with it and move on. I've looked at the picture and the Madrid Building did not collapse. It remained intact but obviously a mess. I've read the official report, so now you're moving the goalposts again. You don't expect people to actually look for information and you fall apart when it happens.

9-11 was an inside job. The Twin Towers were 'dustified' to use a great new word. It is the biggest suicide bombing in history.