Phil Jayhan of LetsRoll911.com talks about the Evan Fairbanks footage. The appendage on bottom can be seen on CNN footage from that day. Its off-centered on the fuselage. Its between the engines. It casts its own shadow. It has its own reflection. It was definitely a three-dimensional piece of equipment.
Col George Nelson, retired from the U.S. Air Force, spent thirty years identifying aircraft and aircraft parts. When he looked at the footage of the plane, he says that it cant be anything other than an external piece of equipment.
Major Glen MacDonald of the U.S. Army states that he has never seen anything like the appendage in question on a commercial airliner. He has, however, seen it on military aircraft. He suggests that it may not have been Flight 175 that hit the South Tower, but a military plane.
Eyewitness Marc Birnbach describes a big gray plane with a blue logo smashing into the South Tower on 9/11. He said it was definitely not a commercial plane. Another eyewitness describes a twin engine, big, gray plane.
Glen Stanish, twenty-year professional airline pilot, founder of Pilots for 9/11 Truth: There was a pod attached to the aircraft and it was not Flight 175.
This is a great video. Watch the rest! There are a lot of good facts here.
@ucancallmeOh
Harrit/Jones won't share their samples of Dust or Data that they say proves nano-thermite. Obvious cover-up.
Do you check for explosives after a car crash? No because its obvious what happened.
They did check the steel for general evidence. And found nothing that indicated temperatures over 1500C, explosive damage, cutting/etc.
So by your definition isn't the author of this video committing a crime claiming it was a missile When you have evidence it was thermite?
ae911truthcensors 1 day ago
@ae911truthcensors ~ NIST, a subdivision of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Zelikow, from the Chamber headed the Official 9/11 Commission and controlled the content of their report. NIST did not check for explosives in the dust of the WTC even though there was a bomb blast from a terrorist in '93 and testimony of explosives on 9/11. NIST won't share its model of collapse, which only goes to "initiation". This is OBVIOUS cover-up.
ucancallmeOh 2 days ago
@ucancallmeOh "We don't know all the facts, but we have that evidence." What does that mean?
You said yourself it is thermite and all other theories are lies and criminal.
Have you read the NIST report?
If it is so cut-dried why won't Harrit/Jones share their samples/data with other scientists?
Still thinking how to answer??
ae911truthcensors 2 days ago
@ucancallmeOh "We don't know all the facts, but we have that evidence." What does that mean?
You said yourself it is thermite and all other theories are lies and criminal.
Have you read the NIST report?
If it is so cut-dried why won't Harrit/Jones share their samples/data with other scientists?
They have proven the Microspheres existed in the concrete (in all concrete) before 9/11.
You have no evidence.
ae911truthcensors 5 days ago 2
@ae911truthcensors ~ re: Missles: I never said "it couldn't be". The 9/11 Truth Movement has more than enough evidence for a mass murder trial and charges of starting wars without cause. That evidence is strongest regarding WTC 7's collapse and the nano-thermite and iron microspheres found in the dust of the WTC. We don't know all the facts, but we have that evidence. The full truth will come out in a trial.
We need to overcome the obstacle of silence/ bias by the mainstream media.
ucancallmeOh 5 days ago
@ucancallmeOh Go to this video called 9/11 Coincidences (11/19) Uploaded by @NuffRespect2 right now. This is a very big debate.
superhero6734100 5 days ago
@ucancallmeOh Wow "PAID DISINFORMATION AGENT" "YOU are an accessory to mass murder."
So is this video a Lie? Criminal according to your definition?
Wouldn't the Official story just be another cause to investigate like:
Thermite
Explosives
Missiles (which you say it couldn't be right?)
So if you are going to court what evidence are you bringing? You know Jones won't share his dust for anyone else to validate.
Have you read the NIST report?
ae911truthcensors 5 days ago
@ae911truthcensors ~ You are a PAID DISINFORMATION AGENT. You are not intellectually honest because you have an agenda of self-interest.
All anyone has to know to be a truther is that the OS (Official Story) contains at least one lie. Like most (mass) murder cases, all the details are not known before a trial, but what is known is that the accused's story does not jibe with the evidence.
Bring on a criminal court case! YOU are an accessory to mass murder.
ucancallmeOh 5 days ago
@ucancallmeOh I totally agree its not a game. That is why when people fabric facts with video tricks they turn it into a game.
So if the "missile theory" is in doubt with you why is it less legitimate than the "airplanes and fire theory" or the "explosives" theory? Do you get how hypocritical you are?
What about the pentagon? Thermite?
Again like the psychologist say about truthers: You started with the premise that the govt. is behind it. Then fabricate reality to support this.
ae911truthcensors 5 days ago
@ae911truthcensors ~ Honestly, people like you literally make me sick. You act like it's a game or something. This country is morally and financially bankrupt as a result of 9/11. It's not a game. You are spinning and twisting people's words, but it's just a stupid waste of my time.
As for the plane/ missle thing: I don't know. Is it a trick from the perpatraitors to lead the 9/11 Truth Movement down a false track to make it look foolish? Is is real? I don't know. I do know OS=LIES.
ucancallmeOh 6 days ago