Who wrote the Gospels?
Loading...
Loading...
3,960
Loading...
There is no Interactive Transcript.
Uploaded by ehrmanproject on Oct 1, 2010
Dr. Michael Kruger - "Who wrote the Gospels?"
http://ehrmanproject.com
- 52 likes, 18 dislikes
-
- 4:27
Why are the birth narratives so different? (Part 1)by ehrmanproject1,715 views
- 3:12
Are the New Testament manuscripts reliable? (Part 1)by ehrmanproject6,721 views
- 3:02
Which day was Jesus crucified?by ehrmanproject1,603 views
- 4:11
How do we explain the Bible's 400,000 errors?by ehrmanproject2,482 views
- 2:56
How did the New Testament canon develop?by ehrmanproject2,038 views
- 1:53
Dan Wallace on His Recent Debate With Bart Ehrman.MP4by milico8852,331 views
- 0:31
EhrmanProject.com Promotional Videoby ehrmanproject7,726 views
- 5:19
Did Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John actually author the gospel accounts?by ehrmanproject1,527 views
- 8:11
Is the Trinity in the Old Testament Debate: Scholars Vs. Trinitarian Fundamentalistby YahyaSnow3,719 views
- 9:57
Who Wrote The Gospels? - By Yusuf Estes Part 1by islamthebest12,789 views
- 5:03
What are some passages you interpret differently than Dr. Ehrman? (Part 2; 1 John 5:7-8)by ehrmanproject2,588 views
- 2:31
Why does a 'loving God' permit evil in our world?by ehrmanproject7,851 views
- 3:11
Disagreements over Jesus and Christology in the early church.by ehrmanproject1,735 views
- 1:43
Welcome to the Ehrman Projectby ehrmanproject12,406 views
- 7:28
Paul invented Christianity. Follow Jesus only. 2/2by HisWordsAreTruth8,451 views
- 5:24
Why are the birth narratives so different? (Part 2)by ehrmanproject1,323 views
- 4:45
Bible Corrupted? Dead Sea Scrolls Prove Otherwiseby JesusOrMuhammad2,841 views
- 9:04
Paul invented Christianity. Follow Jesus only. 1/2by HisWordsAreTruth15,478 views
- 3:37
Does Mark incorrectly quote 1 Samuel?by ehrmanproject1,567 views
You say that Ehrman makes claims that he did not make. You mislead the viewers, which is typical of biased, closed-minded people like you - very much like politicians. You are incorrect; Ehrman is correct. I ask the viewers of this video to do a survey of true scholars of early Christianity. This guy is a fraud.
AlShaddai 3 days ago
@crucisnh Pretty sure he dates Mark 65-70, not 60
AR333 2 weeks ago
This clip disingenuously says that Dr Ehrman claims that the Gospels were written "late in the 1st century". Actually, from what I've heard him say numerous times is that he's using the dates that are commonly agreed to by biblical scholars, i.e. Mark about 60 AD, Matthew and Luke about 80-ish AD, and John about 90-ish AD. 60 AD is hardly "late in the 1st century". So this statement is simply false.
crucisnh 3 weeks ago
@TheSmithDorian In Orthodox Christian tradition there are teachings clamed to apostolic . Some of the teachings are clearly not-authentic, however others seem to retain pre-bible practices early Christians had. Like a Christian liturgy, for example.
MegaVldmr 1 month ago
Very good, clear and reasonable.
xchampx 1 month ago
@MegaVldmr 2
.. wrong all along. So they accepted the most widely used 4 gospels to ensure that as many Christian communities were on board as possible, and had to live with the differences between them. That said though, there certainly were attempts to 'harmonize' the gospels in the early days of the church.
It can't be anything to do with apostolic teachings being used in conjunction with gospels because we don't have any such teachings - other than those that are actually in the Bible.
TheSmithDorian 1 month ago
The Gospels were written by the great Greek writer Anonymous.
harpo103 1 month ago
Yeah, but, the Gospels were written WAY after the events actually happened. Probably, AFTER the apostles were dead! Mark is the earliest book, written a generation after Jesus preached. The Gospels are paraphrasing, not dictation.
harpo103 1 month ago
@ndzoko Whats so iffy in people coming out of the graves.IF you are a thiest and you think GOD made heavens,it doesnt take much to imagine ^^,the same happening.
bloodhoundHermetic 3 months ago
Whatever happened to the 'Q Source' document, that is likely the other source document besides Mark's epistle, for the Matthew and Luke tomes?
bjdon99 4 months ago