@chumbucket843 I have done high resolution offline simulations but I like realtime more. You can set up a big scene and let it run overnight but with realtime you can control every moment. Besides, with both more efficient simulation algorithms and faster computers, real time can be very highly detailed. This has 24,000 particles running on a single core in the browser.
@iamvfx I like the amount of control you get when you interact in 2D. With a computer, all you get is a mouse, and the screen is also flat so your means of interaction is only 2 dimensional. Anyway, all of this could easily be translated into a 3D simulator. It's just in terms of interaction I prefer playing with 2D fluids.
Have you ever considered doing simulations outside of realtime?
chumbucket843 1 month ago
@chumbucket843 I have done high resolution offline simulations but I like realtime more. You can set up a big scene and let it run overnight but with realtime you can control every moment. Besides, with both more efficient simulation algorithms and faster computers, real time can be very highly detailed. This has 24,000 particles running on a single core in the browser.
kotsoft 1 month ago
Happy New Year, Grant! In the new year I want to ask you... Why you not do this cool stuff in 3D?
iamvfx 1 month ago
@iamvfx I like the amount of control you get when you interact in 2D. With a computer, all you get is a mouse, and the screen is also flat so your means of interaction is only 2 dimensional. Anyway, all of this could easily be translated into a 3D simulator. It's just in terms of interaction I prefer playing with 2D fluids.
kotsoft 1 month ago