Frasier You Can Never Go Home Again Season 3 Episode 24

Season 3, Episode 24 Aired: 5/21/1996
You Can Never Go Home Again

Roz gives Frasier a copy of his first broadcast as a present to celebrate his three-year anniversary at KACL. As he listens, Frasier remembers the events as he first arrived in Seattle and reunited with Niles and Martin.

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• frasier
• season 3
• episode 24
• kelsey Grammer
• david hyde pierce
• comedy
• entertainment

[grumpytosnowwhite]

@13charachters 1)The pilot wasn't Frasier's first day at the station. Did you even watch the pilot? It was set a few months after he started the job. Martin isn't living with Frasier in this ep, because this was, duh, *before* he moved in in the pilot. 2) Frasier could've started collecting tapes after Roz gave him the first tape as a present 3) Are you kidding? No one would recognize a stranger they glanced at for half a second months later 4) He could've cut it and then grown it back.

[citygirl2192]

It's weird to think that the Crane brothers were even capable of going two years without seeing each other

[EricGrain]

@citygirl2192 Yes, it is hard to not see them sitting in the coffee shop each episode. Imagine the two years of Niles without Fraiser

[HughGarrette]

'dusted with the faintest whisper of cinnamon!'

[eleventy2skadoo]

@ThisCitySlept I'd imagine each tape would hold more than one episode. At least 2 if its double sided, 4 if 2 episodes fit on each side.

[irondogon]

or vice versa :-)

[irondogon]

Since it.s Frasier's memory, maybe the physical discrepancies can be put down to his faulty pov?

[1Sandwitch1]

I always hated this episode...they fucked it up totally, he didnt even look anything like that back in 93, he had tons of hair. I can't get over it.

[Sonnnymausi]

Haha, Eddie´s staring at Niles xD

[Sonnnymausi]

07:31 to 07:52 xD

[ArThorAlfathir]

I love this one, but I wish they had given him a piece to match his hair in the first season.

[Tom36456]

"Little owlet in the glen, I’m ashamed of you. You’re ungrammatical in your speaking as you do. You should say 'to whom, to whom', not 'to who, to who.' Your little friend, Miss Katty-did, may be green, ‘tis true, but you never heard her say—who the hell are you?!"