Controlled Demolition vs. Structural Damage - New Footage WTC 7

Study of controlled demolitions vs. buildings that fell due to shoddy construction/structural damage. Also a look at Larry Silverstein on his morning of September 11th, 2001. New footage.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• WTC 7
• Larry Silverstein
• Controlled Demolition
• September 11
• 2001
• 911
• 9/11 WTC 7
• building 7
• buildings falling

[DivineFellowship]

Silverstein's one real slimy Zionist. But so were the key Zionist players and 9-11 materminds Zelikow, Zahkheim, Chertoff, and the others.

[mikegervace]

for the people that don't know, the WORD "PULL" at the end, by the leasholder of the building means....Pull = Demolish, Demo, Bring it down...so he even says "they decided to pull it".......later he says that he was referring to the people / firefighters in the building YUET, they have reportedly vacated WTC7 by noon...WTC7 came down at 5:20PM.........good stuff...

bring back Molder&Scully :-)

[iBlindGame]

@Daniel092004 Re: "I know for a fact that until every factor is absolutely calculated and replicated, anyone saying that they know anything for certain is an arrogant jerk who doesn't know what they're talking about."> Let's say you applied this to genetics. Would that mean until we know everything about genetics we can't say we know anything about it? Black and white thinking. Fact: NIST is unscientific: watch?v=4ZrcDTjkIhI All facts aren't needed to know things (a priori knowledge).

[Daniel092004]

@iBlindGame I know for a fact that until every factor is absolutely calculated and replicated, anyone saying that they know anything for certain is an arrogant jerk who doesn't know what they're talking about. I simply believe that the NIST report makes sense. Anti-NIST people (like a religion, they are) believe with all their hearts that NIST is practically a satanic organization bent on altering data and faking ideas. Saying something breaks physics does not make you all-knowledgeable.

[iBlindGame]

@Daniel092004 NIST used bad logic to rule out thermite and explosives. You may not understand that because of the effects of propaganda, but this is a fact that an unbiased mind can comprehend, even without understanding physics. Furthermore, the data of NIST's simulation of WTC7 was never released due to the claim that it "might jeopardize public safety." Think scientifically -- what can you know for sure. Verify it.

[TheEots]

@Daniel092004 such as ?

[super16g123]

@Daniel092004 the final nist report ruled out that neither diesel fuel fire or damage from the other 2 towers contributed to the collapse of building 7....so what was left out??

[kansasisaband]

Mute this good video to nice factoid @4:15

[Daniel092004]

Ah. I love truther propaganda that ignores most of what happened to WTC 7. Well, at least you're enthusiastic about it.