At the Movies with Siskel & Ebert, July 1983-Krull

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,049
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 29, 2009

It seems that Ebert takes a shot at Dragonslayer, and yet he gave it 3 stars in his review the Sun-Times. I saw this when I was 13. I didn't like it all that much then, and I recently tried to watch it again. Yyyyeaahhh. Not so good, and I usually love 80's fantasy.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (gradepoint)

  • how dare he talk shit about "Dragon Slayer"!!!

  • I don't quite understand his comment about Dragonslayer, because if I'm not mistaken, he gave a favorable review. I'm pretty sure you can find his review on his website.

Top Comments

  • I loved Gene's comment regarding this film on the "Worst of" segment for the year - "I can't even remember what Krull was, it sounds like a dessert!".

    Good ol' Gene :)

  • No it wasn't, think about it we had movies like alien, star wars, empire strike back, Close Encounters of the Third Kind and Tron. These movies had impressive visual effects for their time.

see all

All Comments (40)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @VitoPossilipo reply. All the best from Berlin!

    P.S.: I like your channel photo.

  • @Tessmage Thank you for your reply. No, I don´t want to become more "sophisticated" in my tastes, what ever you mean by that. I rather love exciting, adventurous movies that inspire my imagination than for example boring but sophisticated movies like "Citizen Kane" or disgusting misanthropic, but sophisticated ordeals like "The Tin Drum".

    And I don´t understand what´s supposed to be more sophisticated about a movie like "Star Wars" than the much more original "Krull".

    Looking forward to your

  • @VitoPossilipo

    Become more sophisticated with your tastes, perhaps..?

  • @VitoPossilipo "insults", of course.

  • I love this movie and it offends me when someone insult it (especially when he hasn´t got proper arguments like these two fantasy lacking squares). What can I do about this problem?

  • And poor Lysette Anthony; not only does she have to act through some of the porrest conceived scenes, they producers dubbed over her voice with Lindsay Crouse.

  • @SanitariumLXIX Absolutely. I still like to watch the end credits (not the rest of the film), just so I can hear that music again, and try to imagine the better film it might have been the perfect capper for.

  • The only thing I really liked about Krull was James Horner's score.

  • @VitoPossilipo Sorry, I´ve meant "virtues", not "values". English isn´t my mother tongue. I´m German.

  • @VitoPossilipo So what! Since when are movies destroyed by such details? What about all the adventure, action, fantasy and atmosphere of this movie and it´s unique, creepy designs, not to mention the virtuosic direction of the kudos director (can you say that in English?) Peter Yates?

    And by the way: Classic Hollywood classics are full of gigantic plot holes. But no critic seems to be disturbed by them.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more