WTC Collapse (rare view)

WTC 2

Release_27\42A0239 - G26D114\VIDEO_TS\VTS_01_1.vob

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• wtc
• world
• trade
• center
• wtc1
• wtc2
• wtc 1
• wtc 2
• collapsing
• collapse
• explosion
• explosions
• september
• building
• twin
• towers
• 911
• 9/11
• foia
• release
• 27
• columns
• blow
• pulverize
• shatter
• rare
• view
• throw
• out
• inside
• thermite
• thermate
• explosive
• explosives
• attack
• 9 11
• job
• column
• force
• gravity

[MysticalGrooveWTC]

amazing shot bro where'd you get it?

[DrVresig]

@MysticalGrooveWTC FOIA: Release_27\42A0239 - G26D114\VIDEO_TS\VTS_01_1.vob

Just google --> 911datasets <--

[andybb10]

clearly shows explosive action. the idea that columns buckled (simultaneously and in perfect harmony across the entire perimeter all the way down), is ABSURD. Anyone viewing this and still accepting the "official" explanation of 9/11 is clearly and thoroughly brainwashed to the nth degree. 

Thanks for posting!

[TheFrostbite57]

@Stu3100 mhmm, man you better look in to one of the buildings that fell down perfectly (like the towers, I mean really? Fucking neat little pile with out explosives? Give me a break) and had a crimp, EXACTLY how demo experts do it? Get educated you fool, your country is just greedy for Oil. 9/11 was a hoax. Plus... 66 or so video cameras aimed at the pentagon, and not one saw the plane hit it? Hmmm.. Man I better just blindly follow my government, they have a good history with truth.. idiot

[roquefortfiles]

@Sandberg1972 U can't have it both ways.

And we don't have it both ways. You simply don't understand what you're talking about.

Go and have a look at LANDMARK implosion. Firstly.. (Umm. listen to it!! that should be enough for you LOL!!)

Secondly. Notice how this building is falling? Cohesively as a unit. It is not being laid out for a block in every direction. Why? Because the resistance is being removed by the charges.

The WTC is nothing BUT resistance.

[roquefortfiles]

@Sandberg1972 But there was hardly any resistance to the collapses, something NIST tried to pretend was normal to assume, even though there wasn't any basis to do so.

No you're completely wrong.

The collapse was nothing BUT resistance.

In a CD the charges remove the resistance as the structure falls. Everything is moving together. The debris lands at its footprint.

This is not happening at the WTC. The entire collapse is complete resistance being spewed 500 feet sideways

[roquefortfiles]

@Sandberg1972 without the use of explosives, should've toppled off, as the centre of gravity of the 30-storyblock would shift off centre more and more, until it would go outside of the footprint of the building.

No.. No no. We are not talking about a set of building blocks here. The gravity loads all are directed straight down. The building is basically hollow inside. 90% of it is just air.

More than enough weight to bring down the structure.

[roquefortfiles]

@Sandberg1972This is explosive action we're watching in this vid. But u're free to believe it's airpressure

Explosive action? With what? Silent explosives?.. There is a camera crew 800 feet from this building as it collapses. They record nothing. Not one bang not one charge.

Ever experienced shape charges? I have.

Let me assure you there is no way on this earth your going to have a camera crew 800 feet away record nothing.

I have done exactly this. Its not remotely possible.

[roquefortfiles]

@Sandberg1972airdefence failures

Uh.. NO!!.. Go and look at the time lines of each jet. There WAS no time to do anything about this.  That's thing that gets me angry. People don't understand what they are talking about on this.

Go do a Google search on U 175 timeline. Taken DIRECTLY from ATC reports. There was all but 15 mins from the time it was DECLARED a hijack to the time it hit the buildings. No time to do ZIP.

Explosive action?..

Nope!! Been there dude!!

[Sandberg1972]

@roquefortfiles

-airdefence failures

-NIST's fraudulent reports

-government cover up/stonewalling

-collusion between hijackers and intel agencies

None of this seems to concern you, fine by me. But what's all the fuzz about then? Why protest so much? Why not let me be the fool, and you just worry about your own life, u see?

This video is clear enough for anyone to get to grips with reality.

This is explosive action we're watching in this vid. But u're free to believe it's airpressure

[Sandberg1972]

@roquefortfiles "The failure point is where the plane hit it. Everything above that is descending on the lower floors."

Yes except those 30 floors of WTC2 did not descend straight down but instead were leaning to the east and, without the use of explosives, should've toppled off, as the centre of gravity of the 30-storyblock would shift off centre more and more, until it would go outside of the footprint of the building.

So, anything u'd like to say?

[Sandberg1972]

@roquefortfiles The "descending mass" you describe consists of mostly air (as some like to make it look like the lower part was pretty weak & ready to be annihilated). Ever seen nearly all the concrete turn to dust in a regular CD? I haven't.

In order to crush something u need it to resist very heavily. But there was hardly any resistance to the collapses, something NIST tried to pretend was normal to assume, even though there wasn't any basis to do so.

U can't have it both ways.

[roquefortfiles]

@Sandberg1972 It always amazes me how far they go to keep avoiding the crucial issues about that fateful day,

Such as what?