Ron Paul: Bad Foreign Policy Started with Woodrow Wilson

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
52,289
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 20, 2007

During a campaign stop in Austin, TX, Congressman Ron Paul commented on the Iraq War, his controversial experience at the recent Republican Debates and on the need to curb bad foreign policy and bad economic policy, including statements concerning the New World Order's plan for a one-world government-- a plan, he says, that includes the U.N. and was something the First President Bush was working towards.

Ron Paul explains that the founding fathers were right on foreign policy-- make friends and trade, but don't become entangled in alliances.

www.RonPaul2008.com
www.INFOWARS.com
www.PRISONPLANET.TV

  • likes, 26 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • ron paul makes a lot of sense .

  • Thank the dems for Woodrow Wilson. First draft, income tax, federal reserver, first drug prohibition. Good job asshole.

see all

All Comments (508)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @titans797979 Sighhhh, idiocy by people like you make me want to throw up.

  • @BATCH420 Ahhh, another one of you Ron Paul sheep, agreeing on every brainwashed statement, even attacks on one of our greatest Presidents.

  • It makes me so happy to see those marines clap for his foreign policy

  • Wilson can be looked at for being a bad guy, but he came in at a terrible, terrible time in terms of foreign prospects and the American people's ideology. He WAS dragged into the war and he WAS dragged into prohibition, chill out.

  • Paul for peace, Paul for the people, Paul for prosperity! 2012 & Beyond!

  • Notice how the press ignores this guy because they want the whore Michelle and the other male prostitute, Perry Boy. The United States of today, sucks.

  • @jetblackjp how is it a good thing? How are monopolies sprouting up from all over the place a good thing? This limits ppls choices. Monopolies have no incentive for instance to lower prices or have better rates from consumers due to lack of competition. Ppl have no choice since, well its a monopoly. That doesnt sound like a "free market economist" ideal to me... you deny ppl choices and some who are poor will not be able to afford that good that is monopolized... -_-

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more