Soyuz Launch Escape Tower System

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
34,056
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 25, 2008

The Soyuz T-10-1(1983) was a leakage of fuel and the flames coming in the rocket launch pad.Two seconds before its explodes, the crew was actived the Launch Escape Tower System for eject.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Travellerdream)

  • Hey, man where is the good old music of this video? That older one is much better than the current music. That older song were much more well suited to the video. I know the video is yours, but the old hit is much better. If possible, it would be interesting to watch the same video but with the good old music. Please, pal, reupload it.

  • @nosophorus Oks, that´s is not notorius but, youtube has desativate the audio because a f**** author´s rights. I reupload later, is fit better :=/

  • @nosophorus Olhe esse no meu outro canal! watch?v=b7bDIRmNDcM Enjoy! :=)

  • Why do the Soviet officials ... observing the rocket destroying itself while its crew are pulled from safety in the nick of time ... look bored?

  • I see that cold action (reaction) from them!!! tnks...

  • How cooly did that commie rupert itch his nose as the escape tower flys off into the darkness!!??

  • So, and at that speed,is so brillant!!!Thks.

Top Comments

  • This is amazing and it says a lot of how much safer the soyuz is, the crew of Soyuz 18a did this also, but they ejected while they were flying, they landed safely near the chinese border.

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (56)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Un3g1v3n1 Shut up. They went to the moon. Please stop being stubborn and admit that the huge moment of human triumph happened and stop trying to take away people's achievements. I bet Apollo

    13 never happened either.

  • @GRPiAKus unlikely actually, aerodynamic forces would've still ripped it to shreds, when you look at it both challenger and columbia had the same cause. The people in charge didn't listen to the engineers. Usually the FD etc asks the engineers to prove that the systems of the craft are safe. In both cases they were asked to prove the systems weren't safe and then ignored when they said no (though the challenger engineers did miss something from their presentation that might've persuaded them).

  • Filed under successful suborbital flight :)

  • @Boy75402 The fire burn through the cables that would activate the launch escape system.

  • Space Travel WIN!!!

  • Yep, accidents happen, unless they are going thousands of times further, through magnetosphere-free, deadly space radiation, landing on another body in space, and returning...IN THAT CASE, PERFECTION can be the only outcome!

    RIGHT BUZZ?

    Fucking space fakers!

  • @GRPiAKus

    Dont forget weight.

  • NASA should did this in space shuttles, the crew of Challenger could be alive :(

    But there was one obstacle - MONEY

  • @Boy75402 They were at least a mile away...in the dark it might not have looked that much different from a normal launch at first.

  • 00:38 That Soviet General was wondering whether his neck was big enough for his noose.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more