Ron Paul: The One Who Stood with Reagan (New TV Ad "Trust")

Sign up for email updates: http://www.RonPaul.com/welcome.php - Please like, share, subscribe & comment! http://www.RonPaul.com

09/06/2011

--

Ron Paul is America's leading voice for limited, constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, sound money, and a pro-America foreign policy.

For more information visit the following websites:

http://www.RonPaul.com
http://Store.RonPaul.com
http://www.RonPaul2012.com
http://www.RevolutionPAC.com
http://www.RonPaulNews.com
http://www.house.gov/paul
http://www.DailyPaul.com
http://www.RonPaulForums.com
http://www.RonPaulFlix.com
http://www.RonPaulDailyNews.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• ron paul
• trust
• rick perry
• perry
• reagan
• ronald reagan
• ad
• tv
• texas
• al gore
• cheerleader

[ericsummey95]

Isn't it just funny how Ron Paul's "TV ads" never show up on TV? I'm sick of the media ignoring him.

[Trolling4RonPaul2012]

@MrConservative608 I love Ron Paul but do not like alot of what Ronald Reagan did while in office. Like Ron Paul said it is the idea that was Ronald Reagan that i like.. As for Rick Santorum, i feel he is just trying to emulate Reagan to win the conservative base. But yes, when looked at from a libertarian perspective, Ronald Reagan comes across as a moderate. It just depends on your point of view.

[MrConservative608]

Here is one thing about you Ron Paul supporters I don't get. Rick Santorum's foreign policy is almost word for word with Ronald Reagan's foreign policy, yet Rick Santorum is a neo-con, military-industrial-complex chickenhawk but Ronald Reagan isn't. The only way you can claim Rick Santorum is a neo-con, military-industrial-complex chickenhawk is to say Ronald Reagan was a neo-con, military-industrial-complex chickenhawk. So Ronald Reagan was not a conservative?

[MMAExpertKnower]

@777Atheist Well i don't trust most of the Republican candidates as well. And I also don't trust democrats! I realized it doesnt matter which party you choose, because they are both corrupted. I decided to choose the person I feel is most consistent over the years. ROn Paul can easily be an independent candidate, He fights with his own party to get his point across. And for 30 years he was basicly preaching the same message, without changing his views. I truly do believe him! RON Paul!

[777Atheist]

@MMAExpertKnower I trust none of the Republican Candidates, I also do not trust Obama, happy ? I will not vote for Ron Paul, Reagan was a criminal and Ron Paul using Reagan to gain votes from mainstream Republicans shows that he has no integrity and is not trustworthy candidate, the only people that I would vote for would be Nader or Kucinich, people who are against the Fed, the wars and aren't complete nuts or liars like R.Paul.

[MMAExpertKnower]

@777Atheist Stop being so hateful. Have you even listened to what Ron had said? You look at all the other candidates, and tell me who has more knowledge about the economy, and foreign affairs than Ron Paul.. Ron Paul has a cclear vision. He knows what he wants from the country. All those other candidates are moral majorities. They are nothing but puppets! Ron Paul predicted 911, he predicted social security collapse, he predicted the housing bubble. The others didnt! Please use ur head!

[777Atheist]

Reagan Revolution ? How the fuck am I supposed to like Ron Paul when they make an Ad about him endorsing Reagan, the man that started the war on drugs !! Why isn't Nader running for President he would make a much better President than Ron Paul.

[freakingbeam]

@PringDaddyPring Because republicans have become so confused that they no longer understand their own party or its beliefs. They understand that Reagan was one of the good republican presidents with good morals, wit and policies, but they will not try to understand that he also had downfalls and some horrible policies. I remember them attacking Dr. Paul for disagreeing with Reagan on some things. All I could think was "good because Reagan was wrong on some things."

[PringDaddyPring]

I find it funny how republicans are in some weird reagan worship mode now... clearly it's just b/c Bush jr was a disaster... but anyone who follows economics knows that reaganomics is the reason for the financial meltdown and issues we have today (which clinton of course followed too)... so i just find it funny that anyone would say "stood with reagan" and be proud of it (at least at this moment in time)... it's not exactly a good thing economically.

[CrazyDave408]

@NazcarFanatic24 Ron Paul talks about that all the time.