Mac Spoof - iChurch
Top Comments
All Comments (138)
-
@RatherBritishBird1 - I'm British and love the NIV and KJV, but yeah, so long as it isn't a dodgy translation (such as NWT) that warps God's beautiful word, then it's cool with me!
I find this hilarious because I know people like this. In the OT they were known as Pharisees. Now they're known simply as hypocrites. John 4 says God desires worshippers who worship in Spirit and in truth, not ribbon-collectors. :)
-
@snackman94 - The Bible is not 100% arranged in chronological order. Kindarilwraja is right when s/he says the earliest book is most likely Job, if not, then Deuteronomy or parts of Genesis. The History book narratives are largely in order (i.e. Kings, Chronicles (though they charter very similar events), Esther, Ruth... like any library it's arranged in sections:
Genesis & Law
History
Poetry
Major & Minor Prophets
Gospels
Letters
Revelation
Hope that helps. And blessings to all. :)
-
I wonder why 'real' is holding a bible.
-
good video shame over how many people are arguing over bible translations. I'm trying to get as many different versions as possible just so I have them.
-
Shitty apple.
-
@fastermatt Retard! They arent arguing over which bible is better. Theyre just saying it doesnt matter which one you have as long as you read it and actually do godly things. Maybe you should watch it again!
-
@fastermatt Then honour God by picking his word the King James Bible.
yay! my cult gives me ribbons!
deadeaded 1 year ago 4
@snackman94 - Actually, no. The earliest book written was most likely Job. Mark was most likely written before Matthew. Many of the epistles, notably Romans and 1 Corinthians, were written before most of the gospels. I'm not sure where you're getting that the Bible was written chronologically (perhaps you're confusing this with the narratives being roughly in chronological order?), but there's significant evidence and scholarship to the contrary.
kindarilwraja 4 months ago 2