Human Right Problems in Tibet and China Part 1

This is a commentary regarding the issue of human right problems in Tibet and China.
Part of a series of political commentaries about Tibet and China.
Part 1

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• tibet
• riot
• protest
• politics
• china
• media
• western
• government
• lies
• truth
• reason
• dalai
• lama
• documentary
• 西藏
• 中国
• 中华
• 统一

[magnietuit]

you mistook the word "nervous"

chinese are not nervous

chinese are angry

angry about numerous lies and black paintings, which was told by a so called honest "monk"!

disgusting!

[sesenkodude]

Dude, nice vid. I'd love it if people actually watched this.

[eastern2western]

@iamlindsaybutler u can call it bullying or what ever words you wish to use, but it works really well for the last 60 yrs. what ever names you wish to put on their methods, but the end result is the only thing that matters.

[iamlindsaybutler]

@eastern2western China gets angry about Tibet and bullies (financially) other nations in to not saying or doing anything. Is that what you are saying?

[eastern2western]

@iamlindsaybutler may be money has to do with it. when china was broke and had no power, foreign countries walked all over china. now it has money and power, most countries are not willing to sacrifice china for tibet. well it is true that some countries do provide verbal support for tibet, but they usually provide token support but not real support.

[iamlindsaybutler]

@eastern2western My question is why do you think "no country is willing to anger china over tibet"?

[eastern2western]

@iamlindsaybutler come on, after 60 yrs of campaign, dalai lama is still in india. does that basically says a lot about how much un cares about tibet?

[iamlindsaybutler]

@eastern2western why do you think that is?

[eastern2western]

@iamlindsaybutler what the un is asking china to do is a pure token effort, but the reality is no country is willing to anger china over tibet.

[iamlindsaybutler]

@eastern2western The UN has called on China to respect the basic human rights of Tibetians and freedom of self-determination, that is true yes. The International Commission of Jurists also said China were guilty of "acts of genocide" that is also true. So on the one hand China uses the UNs name, but on the other quietly ignores the very same organisation.

[eastern2western]

@iamlindsaybutler hey I do not make the rules but it is true that the communist government was not accepted as a legal government of china before its union with united nations. however, when it joined the un, un had officially accepted tibet as a territory of china which basically legalized the invasion.  if the argument for tibetant independence just because its invasion was illegal, then countries such as usa, australia etc should surrender their lands to the natives (never going to happen)

[iamlindsaybutler]

@eastern2western so you can back date an illegal invasion and make it legal? If the invasion was illegal the resulting occupation of the country (it was recognised as a country then) was therefore also illegal. I suspect that had you of invaded in 1970 (when it was "legal" to do so?) there would have been quite a different international reaction.

Never-the-less thanks for clarifying that is was an illegal act by China to invade Tibet.